Karzai wants the US out of negotiations

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter turbo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Financial aid
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Hamid Karzai's demand for the US to withdraw from negotiations with the Taliban highlights the complexities of US financial aid to Afghanistan. The CIA has maintained a slush fund for over a decade to influence Karzai's inner circle, paying off key figures to stabilize the Afghan government. Critics argue that continued US support perpetuates corruption and mismanagement, suggesting that without financial aid, there may be greater incentive for genuine development in Afghanistan.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of US foreign aid policies
  • Knowledge of Afghanistan's political landscape
  • Familiarity with the role of the CIA in international relations
  • Insight into the implications of financial aid on governance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of US foreign aid on Afghan governance
  • Examine the role of the CIA in funding foreign political entities
  • Analyze case studies of other nations affected by similar financial aid dynamics
  • Investigate strategies for promoting political legitimacy without external financial support
USEFUL FOR

Political analysts, foreign policy experts, and anyone interested in the implications of foreign aid on governance and stability in conflict-affected regions.

turbo
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
3,154
Reaction score
57
In light of his demand (before he will agree to negotiate with the Taliban), I think that it would be a great time for the US to stop supporting him with taxpayer money. Afghanistan is a quagmire, as the Russians found before us, and we should stop dumping money into such a fragmented and corrupt system, IMO.

If Karzai does not want US involvement in negotiations to heal his country, I think he should also forgo US financial aid. I don't think he would last a month in office without massive US cash infusions, though.

These officials say in a bid to maintain influence over President Karzai’s inner circle and “stabilize” the Afghan government, the CIA has for more than a decade financed a “slush fund used to pay off warlords, politicians, lawmakers and other powerful Afghans” upon whom Karzai depends for support, the report adds.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/06/18/309633/us-lawmaker-blocks-afghan-aid/
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
turbo said:
If Karzai does not want US involvement in negotiations to heal his country

It may just be a tactic to show his country who is boss. He must show his legitimacy and control for his own country.

the CIA has for more than a decade financed a “slush fund used to pay off warlords, politicians, lawmakers and other powerful Afghans” upon whom Karzai depends for support

If the payoffs decline, the country might be completely unmanageable.
 
I don't know if the money US and other countries sends to poor and corrupt countries are well-managed, I don't think they are. I think it may help perpetuate bad management, since those corrupt politicians will always be receiving money without doing anything for their country. Moreover they can more easily finance a stronger military and police in case of a popular uprising. If there were no donations, maybe the incentive to develop the country would be greater.
 
I don't see the connection with financial aid and think seizing control from us is exactly what a leader should be doing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
28K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K