KE+PE when a rocket's speed is less than escape velocity?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the total mechanical energy of a rocket when its speed is less than the escape velocity. Participants are exploring the relationship between kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to determine the conditions under which the sum of KE and PE is positive, negative, or zero. Some are questioning the phrasing of the original question, particularly the reference to "force" instead of "energy." Others are discussing the implications of the rocket's inability to reach infinity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing insights and others seeking clarification on the original question's wording. There is acknowledgment of the need for proper formatting and attempts in the initial post, which may influence the level of assistance offered.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the terminology used in the question, specifically the mention of "force" instead of "energy," which has led to some misinterpretation. Additionally, the original poster's lack of adherence to forum guidelines has been highlighted by other participants.

GrimReaper
Hey people, I just want to ask that what will happen to the total mechanical force of the rocket if its speed is less than escape velocity?
a. KE+PE=0
b. KE+PE>0
c. KE+PE<0
d. Depends upon initial speed of the rocket
Pick one. And Why??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess C because at infinity we will have PE=0 and KE> 0 or equal to zero. As the rocket has not the tendency to move to infinity we conclude that
PE+KE <0
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GrimReaper
Gabriele Pinna said:
I guess C because at infinity we will have PE=0 and KE> 0 or equal to zero. As the rocket has not the tendency to move to infinity we conclude that
PE+KE <0
I appreciate that it was a bit tricky with this one, but the rule on homework forums is to give hints and point out errors, not provide complete solutions.
Correspondingly, @GrimReaper should have used the homework template and shown some attempt before meriting any help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gneill
haruspex said:
I appreciate that it was a bit tricky with this one, but the rule on homework forums is to give hints and point out errors, not provide complete solutions.
Correspondingly, @GrimReaper should have used the homework template and shown some attempt before meriting any help.
haruspex said:
I appreciate that it was a bit tricky with this one, but the rule on homework forums is to give hints and point out errors, not provide complete solutions.
Correspondingly, @GrimReaper should have used the homework template and shown some attempt before meriting any help.
I'm sorry if it was a mistake. And I'm totally new to this so I actually don't know how to use this. Thank you for the directions @haruspex.
 
Why is there no answer to this question? (Apart from the obvious fact that the question asks about force and gives answers in energy...)
 
mjc123 said:
Why is there no answer to this question? (Apart from the obvious fact that the question asks about force and gives answers in energy...)
The reference to force in the question statement is clearly an error. It should have said energy.
The answer is given in post #2.
 
haruspex said:
The reference to force in the question statement is clearly an error. It should have said energy.
The answer is given in post #2.
oh sorry, actually its energy. I mistakenly typed force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K