- #1
idfka909
- 3
- 0
To simplify things, I have assumed the keel section is a rectangle and not a foil.
(Also, these specs are taken from an existing design.)
dimensions:
keel 38cm (width/chord) X 3.8cm (height/thick), length 1.64m,
bulb 445Kg Using beamboy, (cantilever with weight at end) the deflection is:-
Using a mass of 445Kg, Moment of Inertia of 380mmX38mm = 1740000, Gpa 210, distance to mid 19mm
Gives a deflection of 17mm.What I would like to know, is this considered a failure. ie the steel was stressed more the 0.2% allowed.
About this allowed 0.2% elongation:-
From a rod rigging spec, 1mm^2 can support 140Kg. = 0.7% elongation. So how does HT steel develop its strength. All steel has approx. the same Modulus of Elasticity, but different ultimate strength, then does it mean that HT steel is allowed to elongate more, ie to 0.7%?
But the yield of point of HT is not well defined, so 0.2% is used?
I'm a little muddled.
thanks,
(Also, these specs are taken from an existing design.)
dimensions:
keel 38cm (width/chord) X 3.8cm (height/thick), length 1.64m,
bulb 445Kg Using beamboy, (cantilever with weight at end) the deflection is:-
Using a mass of 445Kg, Moment of Inertia of 380mmX38mm = 1740000, Gpa 210, distance to mid 19mm
Gives a deflection of 17mm.What I would like to know, is this considered a failure. ie the steel was stressed more the 0.2% allowed.
About this allowed 0.2% elongation:-
From a rod rigging spec, 1mm^2 can support 140Kg. = 0.7% elongation. So how does HT steel develop its strength. All steel has approx. the same Modulus of Elasticity, but different ultimate strength, then does it mean that HT steel is allowed to elongate more, ie to 0.7%?
But the yield of point of HT is not well defined, so 0.2% is used?
I'm a little muddled.
thanks,