Boeing Keep your seatbelt low and tight in flight, especially when seated next to a plugged door

  • Thread starter Thread starter berkeman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aircraft Flight
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a recent incident involving an Alaska Airlines 737 MAX-9 that lost a door plug mid-flight, fortunately with no passengers injured. Concerns are raised about the structural integrity of the aircraft, particularly regarding the bolts that secure the door plug, with suggestions that multiple bolts may have failed or been improperly installed. Participants express skepticism about Boeing's quality control practices and the potential for counterfeit parts contributing to the failure. The grounding of affected aircraft for inspections has caused significant disruptions, leading to discussions about the safety of air travel and the implications for passenger confidence. Overall, the situation highlights serious concerns about aircraft safety and manufacturing standards.
berkeman
Admin
Messages
69,099
Reaction score
23,983
Yikes...

1704589792869.png

https://mentourpilot.com/incident-alaska-air-737-max-9-loses-plugged-door-in-flight/
 
  • Wow
  • Care
Likes difalcojr, dlgoff and sophiecentaur
Physics news on Phys.org
Thankfully, it appears that the seat that was closest to this plugged door of the Alaska MAX-9 was empty.

Sure, it's empty now.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes sbrothy, FactChecker, DaveC426913 and 3 others
A kid next to the door got his shirt ripped off :oops:
 
Awesome, I think I fly one of those next month.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes DryRun and pinball1970
A new -9, about 145 flights since it entered service about 9 weeks ago. Good news for Airbus.

1704658237881.png
 
Last edited:
DaveE said:
Good news for Airbus.
If it's Boeing, I ain't going.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes sophiecentaur, Philo1769, mrrandom and 1 other person
"Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, based in Wichita, Kansas, United States,[2] is an American aerostructure manufacturer, and is the world's largest first-tier aerostructures manufacturer. The company builds several important pieces of Boeing aircraft, including the fuselage of the 737, and 787, as well as the flight deck of the fuselage (referred to as "Section 41" by Boeing) of nearly all of Boeing airliners. Spirit also produces fuselage sections and front wing spars for the Airbus A350."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirit_AeroSystems
 
 
 
  • #10
DaveE said:
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, based in Wichita, Kansas, United States,[2] is an American aerostructure manufacturer
I went through that place when it was Boeing. One of my uncles was a chemist there.
 
  • #11
It's a "door plug" not a "plug door". They are not doors.

The 737MAX has space for two pairs of aft doors. In a very high density configuration there needs to be more doors. On non-ULCC carriers, this is not required. In this case, there is no "deactivated" door. It won't open, period (well, that's the plan).

My friend at Boeing sent me some information. The plug is held by four bolts, one in each corner. Somehow multiple bolts failed.
 
  • #12
Vanadium 50 said:
My friend at Boeing sent me some information. The plug is held by four bolts, one in each corner. Somehow multiple bolts failed.
I'm not an engineer, but maybe it needs 4 or more, shoot, just put a dozen in.
 
  • #13
Greg Bernhardt said:
I'm not an engineer, but maybe it needs 4 or more, shoot, just put a dozen in.
Or give all the passengers an extra shirt. :wink:
 
  • #14
Greg Bernhardt said:
hoot, just put a dozen in.
Adds weight. Why make it a plug at all? Why not leave it a door? Adds weight and costs two seats.

I suspect counterfeit bolts. There was a case not long ago about a guy in London whose company was selling random parts and forging their certification.

IMHO, the person in question (a former DJ in Venezuela, so not at all sketchy) should be duct-taped to one of these doors, and wished a hearty "good luck!". If the parts aren't fake, he doesn't have anything to worry about, does he?
 
  • #15
Vanadium 50 said:
forging
I see what you did there.
 
  • Haha
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #16
Greg Bernhardt said:
I'm not an engineer, but maybe it needs 4 or more, shoot, just put a dozen in.
Bolts don't work if bolts aren't installed properly. It's not too hard for an engineer to design a sound structure on paper. Getting it built correctly is another story. Of course we don't know yet, but if there's a lottery, I've got dibs on a QA failure in the last installation of that door. It wouldn't be the first time there were issues with Boeing assembly quality.
 
  • #17
I have not visited the Boeing factory, but I have visited the airbus factory, and the amount of QC is really impressive. They spend as much time on QC as they do on the actual assembly. While it is possible that all four bolts were put in incorrectly and that the QC team didn't notice. my money is on a part failing. And since everything needs to be certified, that leads me to start thinking about counterfeit parts.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #18
Many, many years ago I worked in Quality Control at a Boeing plant. One day I failed 3 circuit boards for the cabin environmental controls, due to poor workmanship / bad solder joints.

Two days later I was confronted by two irate mid-level folks from Production. They chewed me out for failing the defective boards and stated they " ... didn't want the [assembly] line shut down...".

I wrote a report to my supervisor, but he was not in that day. I happened to see the facility Senior Manager in a hallway, so I handed him the report.

A week later I was 'layed off'.

An 'Enlightening Experience'; pay attention to who you work for!
 
  • Wow
  • Care
Likes Astronuc, dlgoff, difalcojr and 4 others
  • #19
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, Lnewqban and berkeman
  • #21
So now I'm a little more confused (what's new?)...

The reports and the pictures of the opening seem to show little structural damage, other than the missing door plug:

1704741495672.png


https://www.phonearena.com/news/iPh...flight-that-lost-a-door-plug-mid-air_id154105

But the Wikipedia article seems to suggest that the door plug should have been mostly inside the fuselage, sealed by the higher pressure inside the cabin compared to outside at 10k+ feet:

1704741645767.png

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plug_door

So if the Wikipedia sketch is accurate, shouldn't there be a lot of torn up fuselage left behind as the Plug Door was ripped off of the airframe? Or is the Wikipedia drawing incorrect for the Boeing aircraft, and there were literally only 4 bolts holding that Door Plug against the difference in air pressure?
 
  • #22
Looks to me like it needed about 4 bolts top and bottom, 8 on a side: 20 total! Wouldn't add much more weight.

Overengineer it. So, if fake, counterfeit parts of poor quality, if poor workmanship, and if dangerous company QC practices are in place, as all 3 causes are in most engineering disasters, you need to increase the design safety factors accordingly. Radically. Double them?

See how many customers want window seats now.
 
  • #23
As mentioned above, it is not a plug door. We need a different drawing.
 
  • #24
gmax137 said:
As mentioned above, it is not a plug door. We need a different drawing.
Better link please? :smile:
 
  • #25
berkeman said:
Better link please? :smile:
This is all explained in the video in post #9. The bolts don't hold the door horizontally, they keep the door from moving vertically to "unlatch" from the structures that resist the horizontal Δp force.
 
  • #27
DaveE said:
This is all explained in the video in post #9. The bolts don't hold the door horizontally, they keep the door from moving vertically to "unlatch" from the structures that resist the horizontal Δp force.
I just watched that video. It is 18 minutes long, but is very clear with some good photos and explanation of how the plug works.
 
  • #28
berkeman said:
Oh crap...
That's a good read, too!
 
  • #29
russ_watters said:
Awesome, I think I fly one of those next month.

Just take your Leatherman tool through the security checkpoint and use it on the plane to check the tightness of the bolts. I heard somewhere that TSA will be allowing Leatherman tools on flights going forward, as long as you can show that you are an ME and have a boarding pass for a "plugged door aisle". :wink:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, Borg, Tom.G and 2 others
  • #31
Greg Bernhardt said:
Can they just check all the aircraft bolts for tightness please
They have grounded these planes already. This is causing major disruptions.

However, depending on the problem, maybe they will find it, and maybe they won't. If the bolts are bad, but correctly installed, that's a harder problem to catch than if they were installed correctly.
 
  • #32
Greg Bernhardt said:
Can they just check all the aircraft bolts for tightness please

'Scuse me mam, just checking your bolts here today. Okay, you're good. Have a nice flight. :smile:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213 and Greg Bernhardt
  • #33
Is not plug door. Is door plug.

As far as being restricted from flying over water, would you feel better if it weren't so restricted?

I flew on a 777s first flight with passengers. ORD-CDG. There were still bits of plastic covering various things, like the TV controls. Not sure how I felt about being over an ocean on a brand new plane.
 
  • #34
Vanadium 50 said:
I flew on a 777s first flight with passengers. ORD-CDG. There were still bits of plastic covering various things, like the TV controls. Not sure how I felt about being over an ocean on a brand new plane.
Did you pay extra for that?
 
  • #35
Vanadium 50 said:
As far as being restricted from flying over water, would you feel better if it weren't so restricted?
I'd feel better if they'd take it out of service and get it air worthy. If they are so nervous about getting to an airport in time, it aint air worthy.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and dlgoff
  • #36
Greg Bernhardt said:
I'd feel better if they'd take it out of service and get it air worthy.
How is this possible?

One can say "We want 500 hours (or whatever) of overland flying before we take it over the ocean." I think that may even be reasonable. But you can't say "We want 500 hours of overland flying before we take it over the land."

Every US aircraft with that plug is out of service pending inspection. What more do you want?
 
  • #37
Alaska and United Airlines found loose bolts on the door plugs on several of its grounded 737 Max 9 planes days after a door plug blew out of an Alaska Airlines plane while it was in-flight.

https://www.seattletimes.com/busine...olts-on-door-plug-when-inspecting-its-max-9s/

Also, Juan Browne reported that Boeing removes and reinstalls the door plug after they receive the fuselage from Spirit to install the aircraft interior.

 
Last edited:
  • #38
Sounds like a case of RTFM.

"Read the fuc**ng err, fine, manual!"
 
  • #39
Vanadium 50 said:
How is this possible?

One can say "We want 500 hours (or whatever) of overland flying before we take it over the ocean." I think that may even be reasonable. But you can't say "We want 500 hours of overland flying before we take it over the land."

Every US aircraft with that plug is out of service pending inspection. What more do you want?
Passengers. It's about the passengers.
 
  • #40



Bob has his 15 min of fame.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb and DrClaude
  • #41
Vanadium 50 said:
Every US aircraft with that plug is out of service pending inspection. What more do you want?
How about inspected before the door blows off in flight if they were so nervous?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #42
It's like opportunity.

OneDoorCloses_AnotherOneOpens.JPG
 
  • Haha
Likes russ_watters and Greg Bernhardt
  • #43
Greg Bernhardt said:
How about inspected before the door blows off in flight if they were so nervous?
It's not a door. It's a plug.

It surely was inspected. Somewhere there is some paperwork which states how tight the fasteners. Clearly that wasn't enough.

Would more inspections help? Maybe, ,maybe not. Depends on what the problem was - were the bolts too loose? Or were they too fragile? Or is there something else: say a resonance issue causing them to work their way loose. I am unsure that doing more of what didn't work in this case is the solution.

It's also worth pointing out that taking these planes out of service is causing passengers to seek alternatives. Alaska flies about 40 billion passenger-miles per year, and driving kills about 5 people per billion passenger miles. So while they are flying, they save about 200 lives a year. If they lose 40% of their capacity for a week, the expectation value of fatalities due to alternative transportation approaches 1. And that's just Alaska.

I'm not suggesting ignoring the issue. But I am pointing out that overreacting also has its costs.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #44
Bolting a plug? With all that wind pressure and vibration?! Think of bridges.
1704816284232.png
 
  • Haha
Likes nsaspook and dlgoff
  • #45
DaveE said:
"Since we began preliminary inspections on Saturday, we have found instances that appear to relate to installation issues in the door plug – for example, bolts that needed additional tightening," United said in a statement..."
bolt.jpg


The bolt physically traps the guide roller, preventing it from moving "down" in the track. Looks like it will perform this function regardless of how "tight" it is -- as long as it is present. Were they even present? Or maybe the cotter pins were missing and the castle nut vibrated off, and then the bolt escaped. All four of them.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes russ_watters, berkeman and dlgoff
  • #46
DaveE said:
Alaska and United Airlines found loose bolts on the door plugs on several of its grounded 737 Max 9 planes days after a door plug blew out of an Alaska Airlines plane while it was in-flight.

https://www.seattletimes.com/busine...olts-on-door-plug-when-inspecting-its-max-9s/

Also, Juan Browne reported that Boeing removes and reinstalls the door plug after they receive the fuselage from Spirit to install the aircraft interior.


Great video, thanks @DaveE

And "loose bolts"? The Cotter pins would have to have been missing for that to happen, no? I suppose if Boeing reused the Cotter pins after the reinstallation, they could have failed and allowed the nuts to back off, but I can't imagine the technicians reusing Cotter pins.

@Flyboy -- You aren't allowed to reuse Cotter pins during maintenance, right?
 
  • #47
berkeman said:
Great video, thanks @DaveE

And "loose bolts"? The Cotter pins would have to have been missing for that to happen, no? I suppose if Boeing reused the Cotter pins after the reinstallation, they could have failed and allowed the nuts to back off, but I can't imagine the technicians reusing Cotter pins.

@Flyboy -- You aren't allowed to reuse Cotter pins during maintenance, right?

No, never.
1704841011108.png

You use a bent nail instead.
 
  • Haha
Likes russ_watters, dlgoff, berkeman and 1 other person
  • #48
gmax137 said:
Or maybe the cotter pins were missing
When they replace them, it will be "Welcome back, Cotter."
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes nsaspook and dlgoff
  • #49
berkeman said:
And "loose bolts"? The Cotter pins would have to have been missing for that to happen, no? I suppose if Boeing reused the Cotter pins after the reinstallation, they could have failed and allowed the nuts to back off....
This is what caused my in-flight incident...
 
  • #50
russ_watters said:
This is what caused my in-flight incident...
I missed the memo, but am glad you are still with us...
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top