I Kepler orbits for planets of similar masses

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Kepler's laws to a two-body problem where neither mass is significantly larger than the other. It questions how to calculate the period, distance, and velocity of such a system in an inertial reference frame. The third Kepler law is highlighted, noting that the semi-major axis "a" should be considered in relation to the combined masses of the two bodies. The concept of reduced mass is suggested as a potential solution for these calculations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need to adapt Kepler's laws for more complex gravitational interactions.
jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
When we use the third Kepler law to calculate the period, distance and velocity of the Earth, we consider that the Sun is fixed. We know this is not true, because the Sun is also attracted by the Earth. I was wondering, how could we use Kepler laws to calculate the period, distance and velocity of a 2-body-problem in relation to an inertial reference frame, if neithe of them has a mass much larger than the other.

Another doubt, in Third Kepler law seen below:
##\frac{T^2}{a^3}=\frac{4\pi^2}{G(M+m)}##
The "a" is calculated in relation to the other planet (the referential is the second planet) or in relation to an inertial frame?

To illustrate what I mean above, If we consider two bodies, of masses M and 3M, the maximal distance between them is x and the minimum is y. Haw can we calculate the period and the semi-major axes and eccentricities of both ellipses?

Thank you very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jaumzaum said:
I was wondering, how could we use Kepler laws to calculate the period, distance and velocity of a 2-body-problem in relation to an inertial reference frame, if neithe of them has a mass much larger than the other.
You may want to look into the concept of reduced mass.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark, PeroK and Ibix
jaumzaum said:
When we use the third Kepler law to calculate the period, distance and velocity of the Earth, we consider that the Sun is fixed. We know this is not true, because the Sun is also attracted by the Earth. I was wondering, how could we use Kepler laws to calculate the period, distance and velocity of a 2-body-problem in relation to an inertial reference frame, if neithe of them has a mass much larger than the other.

Another doubt, in Third Kepler law seen below:
##\frac{T^2}{a^3}=\frac{4\pi^2}{G(M+m)}##
The "a" is calculated in relation to the other planet (the referential is the second planet) or in relation to an inertial frame?

To illustrate what I mean above, If we consider two bodies, of masses M and 3M, the maximal distance between them is x and the minimum is y. Haw can we calculate the period and the semi-major axes and eccentricities of both ellipses?

Thank you very much
This is the equation of Kepler's 3rd Law under consideration of the finite mass of the Sun, ##M##. That's why the right-hand side also depends on the mass of the planet, ##m##, and thus it's not Kepler's original law, which states that ##T^2/a^3=\text{const}##, i.e., the same constant for all planets in our solar system. That's indeed a good approximation, because ##M \gg m##.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top