I Kerr & Nordström Black Hole Evaporation: Q&A

snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
When a Kerr black hole evaporates, what will the Kerr parameter do?
Stay constant at initial value?
Approach zero?
Approach unity?
Approach a target value somewhere between zero and unity?

Also, Nordström black holes in practice (with matter around) would have a strong tendency to attract charged plasma. But in perfect vacuum? How strong would the leak current out of a Nordström black hole be? Quantum mechanics suggests a tail of tunnelling in strong electric fields. At which charge would a Nordström black hole be evaporating at constant q/m, if the dependence of q on m is that simple? And does the mathematics of Nordström black hole expressly depend on electron rest mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snorkack said:
the Kerr parameter
What do you mean by the Kerr parameter?
 
PeterDonis said:
What do you mean by the Kerr parameter?
The expression
Jc/GM2
where J is angular momentum, c speed of light, G gravitational constant and M the mass of the hole.
It is bound to be between zero (it is Schwarzschild hole) and unity for any black hole.
How does it evolve on Hawking radiation?
 
If you search "Hawking evaporation Kerr BH" you find a good number of reputably published papers discussing this. At the moment, I don't have time to quick read them to try to choose the most informative.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top