Kinetic and Potential Energy on a roller coaster

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving kinetic and potential energy in the context of a roller coaster. The original poster presents a scenario where a roller coaster must achieve a certain speed at the bottom of a hill to reach a higher hill, while assuming a frictionless environment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between kinetic and potential energy, attempting to set up equations based on energy conservation. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the equations used and the interpretation of variables.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on checking energy conservation principles, while others have pointed out potential errors in the equations. The discussion reflects a mix of attempts to clarify the setup and resolve discrepancies in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a typo in the equations, which has led to some confusion. The discussion also highlights the importance of correctly identifying variables in energy equations.

NathanLeduc1
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A roller coaster starts at the top of hill that is 10 m high. If it is to barely make it to the top of a second hill that is 20 m high, how fast must the initial speed of the roller coaster be? Assume that the roller coaster is frictionless.


Homework Equations


KE = 0.5mv^2
PE = mgh

The Attempt at a Solution


mgh=0.5mv^2
gh = 0.5v^2
v = sqrt(2gh)
v = sqrt(2*9.81*20)
v = 20 m/s needed at bottom of second hill.

mgh=0.5mv^2
gh = 0.5v^2
v = sqrt(2gh)
v = sqrt(2*9.81*10)
v = 14 m/s at bottom of hill if initial velocity at top of first hill is 0m/s.

20 m/s - 14 m/s = 6 m/s

6 m/s is the velocity of the roller coaster at the top of the first hill.

Does that look right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, this is not right. Check it this way: compute KE with v = 6 m/s and PE with h = 10 m; the sum is the total energy initially. It must be equal to the total energy finally, which is KE with v = 0 m/s and PE with h = 20 m.
 
Hm, okay. I tried setting the total energy at the top of hill one equal to the total energy at the top of hill two.
0.5m(v1)^2+mg(h1) = 0.5m(v1)^2+mg(h2)
0.5(v1)^2 + g(h1) = 0.5(v1)^2 + g(h2)
v = sqrt(2*g*(h2-h1))
v = sqrt (2*9.81*(20-10))
v = 14 m/s

Would that work?
 
The result is correct, but the first two equations are not correct, having the same v1 symbol on both sides.
 
Oh, yeah... I meant (v2) on the right side of the equations. That was simply a typo.
 
Very well then.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K