Kinetic energy in center of mass reference frame

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the kinetic energy of a two-mass system in both the center of mass (CM) reference frame and another inertial frame (S). It establishes that the kinetic energy in frame S can be expressed in terms of the kinetic energy in the CM frame plus a term related to the center of mass velocity. The key point is that if there are no external forces acting on the system, the velocity of the center of mass remains constant, confirming that the kinetic energy difference is a constant. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these concepts for problem-solving in physics, illustrating that the process of reasoning through questions can be beneficial for others. Overall, the interaction emphasizes the relationship between kinetic energy and reference frames in classical mechanics.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
In MIT OCW's 8.01 "Classical Mechanics" textbook, there is a derivation to show that change in kinetic energy is independent of the choice of relatively inertial reference frames.
Relevant Equations
##K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2##
Here is the relevant chapter.

Suppose we have two masses ##m_1## and ##m_2## interacting via some force, and two reference frames, ##S## and ##CM##. The ##CM## frame is the center of mass reference frame. The origin of this reference frame is at the location of the center of mass of the system.

The position of particle ##j## in frame ##S## is ##\vec{r}_j## and in frame ##CM## is ##\vec{r}_{j}'##.

We have

$$\vec{r}_j=\vec{r}_j'+\vec{r}_{cm}$$

$$\vec{v}_j=\vec{v}_j'+\vec{v}_{cm}$$

Kinetic energy in the CM frame can be shown to be

$$K_{cm}=\frac{1}{2}(m_1v_1'^2+m_2v_2'^2)=\frac{1}{2}\mu\vec{v}_{1,2}^2$$

where ##\mu=\frac{m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2}## and ##\vec{v}_{1,2}=\vec{v}_1-\vec{v}_2##.

My question is about kinetic energy in frame ##S##.

We start with

$$K_S=\frac{1}{2}(m_1v_1^2+m_2v_2^2)$$

And after subbing in ##v_j^2=\vec{v}_j\cdot\vec{v_j}=(\vec{v}_j'+\vec{v}_cm)\cdot(\vec{v}_j'+\vec{v}_{cm})## we end up with

$$K_S=K_{cm}+\frac{1}{2}(m_1+m_2)v_{cm}^2$$

Now, if ##v_{cm}## is constant then ##K_S## differs from ##K_{cm}## by a constant.

But how do we know that ##v_{cm}## is constant?

After writing this up I think I figured out the answer.

There are no external forces on the system of two particles. Thus, the acceleration of the center of mass is zero. Thus the velocity of the center of mass is constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since I already solved the question, I think this question can be deleted.
 
zenterix said:
Since I already solved the question, I think this question can be deleted.
Why? This is not only about you. It's a good illustration of how one grapples with a question and reasons out the answer. Others might profit from it by seeing that, more often than not, getting to the answer is not as smooth a process as textbooks want us to believe.
 
  • Like
Likes sakib71, zenterix and MatinSAR
zenterix said:
Since I already solved the question, I think this question can be deleted.
You can also get the result without considering the CoM frame. If two inertial frames are related by some relative velocity ##\vec v##, then the KE of mass ##m_1## is related by:
$$KE_1' = \frac 1 2 m_1v_1'^2 = \frac 1 2 m_1|\vec v_1 +\vec v|^2$$$$= \frac 1 2 m_1(v_1^2 + 2\vec v_1\cdot \vec v + v^2)$$$$= KE_1 + \vec p_1 \cdot \vec v + \frac 1 2 m_1v^2$$Hence, the change in KE is:
$$\Delta KE_1' = \Delta KE_1 + \Delta \vec p_1 \cdot \vec v$$Hence, for a system of (any number of) particles:
$$\Delta KE' = \Delta KE + \Delta \vec P \cdot \vec v$$So, if the total momentum of the system is conserved (##\Delta \vec P = 0##), then the change in KE is independent of the inertial reference frame.
 
  • Like
Likes zenterix and TSny
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
988
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K