Kinetic Energy on Incline Objects: Cylinder, Sphere, Hoop, All Same?

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Physics
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the kinetic energy of different objects (cylinder, sphere, hoop) rolling down an incline, concluding that they all have the same kinetic energy at the bottom despite differences in rotational kinetic energy. The sphere, while having the least rotational kinetic energy, still ends up with the same total kinetic energy as the others due to energy conservation principles. In a separate scenario involving a cannon and a ball, the center of mass of the system remains unchanged after firing, even though the cannon and ball do not have equal momentum due to their opposite directions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding momentum as a vector quantity and the conservation of energy in these contexts. Overall, the principles of kinetic energy and momentum conservation are key to resolving the questions raised.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
Which on the following objects has the least kinetic energy at the bottom of the incline if they have the same mass and radius:
A) cylinder
B) sphere
C) hoop
D) all have the same

I piced B but the answer is D. My question is, the sphere has the least rotational kinetic energy, which means it will roll slowly, making it's kinetic energy less than the hoop or cylinder. I don't understand how they can all have the same kinetic energy when the hoop has a greater rotational kinetic energy.

When a ball is fired from a cannon wth a mass much greater than that of the ball, which of the following is true?

The answer is "The center of mass of the system remains unchanged." I picked "The ball and the cannon have equal momentum after the ball is fired"
I picked this because if the cannon and ball represents an elastic collision. I don't see why my answer isn't valid.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first answer is D because the center of mass of each shape dropped the same heighth, so each acquired the same amount of kinetic energy.

Technically, the cannon and the ball don't have the same momentum. Momentum is a vector. But as long as you understand that the center of mass does remain the same you aren't too far wrong. And yes if the cannon and ball conserve momentum, neglecting the gunpowder/gases of course.
 
for #1, how can one object gain more velocity than the other while keeping the energy balanced?

for #2, when the cannon fires the ball, the cannon repels backwards keeping the same momentum that it gave the ball. If this was false and momentum was not conserved, then I don't see how the center of mass can be conserved.
 
#1 Conservation of Energy. Energy acquired from g*m*delta h = rotational + translational kinetic energy.

#2 The "momentum of cannon and ball are equal" is a trick answer. The magnitudes are equal, yes. But momentum is a vector, and two vectors aren't equal unless both magnitude and direction are equal. These are opposite. So the aren't equal.

The CoM is conserved.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
875
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
878
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K