A Kirchhoff law for absorption and emission of a gas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on Kirchhoff's extended law regarding the absorption and emission of gases at thermodynamic equilibrium. It states that the amount of absorbed energy must be emitted with equal probability in all directions at the same wavelength. The distinction between reflection and emission is noted, where reflection can predict the direction of photons, while emission occurs uniformly. The scenario involves a gas in an enclosure where the walls interact with photons, confirming that absorbed photons are emitted isotropically. This understanding is crucial for analyzing energy transfer in thermodynamic systems.
Carlos de Meo
Messages
22
Reaction score
2
Hi Guys
I´m studying the absorption and emission phenomena of a gas and, according to Kirchhoff "extended" law, for a body at thermodynamic equilibrium, the following statement is true.
ελ(T,θ,φ) = Aλ(T, θ,φ).
So, if i understood correctly the meaning of this equation, The amount of absorbed energy must be emitted with the same probability at all direction at the same wavelength, is it correct?
If so, the only difference between reflection and emission at equilibrium (in therms of energy) is that i´m able to predict the direction of the reflected photon (assuming specular reflection) and for the absorption/emission phenomena, i can only say that it happens with the same probability through all direction?
Thank you very much for your time and patience
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you please give more details of the physical system you are considering?
 
Oh sure, sorry about that.
If we think an enclosure containing a gas inside. This system is already at thermodynamic equilibrium. The walls are reflecting, absorbing and emitting photons,the gas is absorbing and emitting (lets not talk about scattering at the moment). So if i apply the Kirchhoff equation for this system, it says that when a photon is absorbed, it should be emitted through all direction with the same probability at the same wavelength that it was absorbed?
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top