Kirchhoff's Rules, system of equation problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter coile3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules System
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a DC circuit problem using Kirchhoff's rules, where the user encountered an issue with dependent equations leading to an infinite number of solutions. It was determined that two of the three equations derived from the loop rule were equivalent, resulting in insufficient information to solve for the three unknown currents. The addition of the junction rule is necessary to provide a unique solution, as it introduces an additional independent equation. Users are advised to always incorporate the junction rule when formulating equations for circuit analysis. This ensures a complete and solvable system of equations.
coile3
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I came up with three equations, to find three different currents in a DC circuit, using Kirchhoff's loop rule, but when I solved them as a matrix in my calculator the bottom row becomes all zero's and the first two rows do not appear to be in "rref" form. I solved the system of equations by hand and when I add the solution from the first two (my new equation) to the third I get 0=0. Is this because they are dependent? If I use Kirchoffs junction rule to get an additional equation I can substitute the junction equation for any of the original three and get the answers. Should I always use the junction rule to find at least one of my equations, and is this problem due to not having used an equation from the junction rule originally or is it an occasional occurance and normally using any three equations (following Kirchhoff's rules) will give me the results I need?

thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably, two of the three equations you obtained using the loop rule are equivalent, which means that without the junction rule you don't have enough information to solve the problem.

Essentially, you're trying to solve 2 equations for 3 unknowns, so you get an infinite number of possible solutions. The addition of the junction rule narrows it down to one solution.
 
Thanksl that is exactly what has happened, I get an infinite amount of solutions so, Does that mean I should always use an equation generated by the junction rule?
 
Does that mean I should always use an equation generated by the junction rule?

In these types of problems it is usually necessary, since the currents are related.
 
You MUST use the junction rule (explicitly or implicitly). You will have an insufficient number of linearly independent equations without it.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K