Kittel Chapter 7: Empty Lattice Approximation

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around the "Empty Lattice Approximation" as presented in Kittel's solid-state physics book, specifically in the context of solid-state physics and band theory. Participants are exploring the meaning and implications of this approximation, as well as its differences from other models like the free electron Fermi gas.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the meaning of the "Empty Lattice Approximation," questioning its necessity and application. There are comparisons being made between this approximation and the free electron Fermi gas model, with discussions on how band structures are derived in each case.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the differences between the empty lattice approximation and the free electron Fermi gas. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of band structures and energy gaps, but there is no explicit consensus on the interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with assumptions about the periodic potential and the implications of treating empty space as a lattice. There is a noted lack of clarity regarding the representation of band structures and energy gaps in the empty lattice approximation.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] kittel chapter 7

Homework Statement


This question refers to Kittel's solid-state physics book. I have edition 8.

In this chapter, there is a section called the "Empty Lattice Approximation". Can someone explain what the title of that chapter means i.e. in what sense is that lattice empty, where is that used, why is that approximation necessary?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have Kittel in front of me, but I think he just means to treat empty space as a periodic potential (which it is...) with whatever period you want (say, 'a'). One can break up the free particle energy spectrum and shift it along reciprocal "lattice" vectors ((2 Pi)/a, or whatever) and get something that looks like a band structure for the free particle.
 
What is the difference between the empty lattice approximation and the free electron fermi gas?
 
anyone?
 
Help!
 
ehrenfest said:
What is the difference between the empty lattice approximation and the free electron fermi gas?

in the empty lattice approximation you pretend there is still a lattice so you get bands--bands determined by shifting the free electron dispersion through a reciprocal lattice vector--and you fill up the bands till you get the number of electrons you want.

in the free electron gas there is no lattice and you just fill up the fermi sphere till you get the number of electrons you want.
 
olgranpappy said:
in the empty lattice approximation you pretend there is still a lattice so you get bands--bands determined by shifting the free electron dispersion through a reciprocal lattice vector--and you fill up the bands till you get the number of electrons you want.

in the free electron gas there is no lattice and you just fill up the fermi sphere till you get the number of electrons you want.

So the empty lattice approximation IS the reduced zone scheme, correct? I guess, I just don't see at all how that represents the band structure because then the dispersion relation is continuous at the BZ boundary in the empty lattice approximation That is, it just bounces back and forth between the boundaries. I thought that the point of an energy band was that it the dispersion relation WAS NOT CONTINUOUS. What I am saying is that there are no energy gaps in the empty lattice approximation and isn't that what we are interested in?
 
Last edited:
I don't know what *we* are interested in. But, yes, in the empty lattice there are no gaps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
22K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K