Solved: Kittel Problem 7.1 About Kinetic Energy in Square Lattice

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Kittel's solid-state physics problem 7.1 from the 8th edition, which addresses the kinetic energy of free electrons in a two-dimensional simple square lattice. It is established that the kinetic energy of an electron located at the corner of the first Brillouin zone is indeed higher than that of an electron at the midpoint of a side face of the zone by a factor of 2. The confusion arises from the terminology used, specifically regarding the reference to the Brillouin zone in real space versus k-space. The correct interpretation emphasizes the k-vector positions of the electrons rather than their physical locations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solid-state physics concepts
  • Familiarity with Brillouin zones and k-space
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy calculations in quantum mechanics
  • Proficiency in interpreting physics problems from Kittel's textbook
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of Brillouin zones in solid-state physics
  • Learn about the relationship between k-vectors and electron energy levels
  • Review kinetic energy equations in quantum mechanics
  • Explore examples of two-dimensional lattice structures and their properties
USEFUL FOR

Students of solid-state physics, educators teaching quantum mechanics, and researchers focusing on electron behavior in crystalline materials will benefit from this discussion.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] kittel problem 7.1

Homework Statement


This question relates to Kittel's solid-state physics book. I have the 8th edition.

In this question, he says:

"Show for a simple square lattice (two dimensions) that the kinetic energy of a free electron at a corner of the first (I assume Brillioun is missing) zone is higher than that of an electron at the midpoint of a side face of the zone by a factor of 2."

But I thought you only discussed Brillioun zones in relation to k-space, not real space? It makes absolutely no sense to me to say that an electron is at a location in the first Brillioun.

Should this question really be:

"Show for a simple square lattice (two dimensions) that the kinetic energy of a free electron whose k-vector is at the corner of the first (I assume Brillioun is missing) zone is higher than that of an electron whose k-vector is at the midpoint of a side face of the zone by a factor of 2."

?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes the question is to be understood that way :-)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
22K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K