KSTAR recent result and breakeven

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimgraber
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The KSTAR fusion device achieved a significant milestone by maintaining plasma for 20 seconds at an ion temperature exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius during the 2020 Plasma Campaign. The discussion highlights the ambiguity surrounding the plasma composition, specifically whether ordinary hydrogen (H2) or deuterium (D) was used, as the press release lacked clarity on this aspect. Additionally, it mentions an estimated ion density range of 1013 to 1014 cm-3, which is crucial for understanding the conditions necessary for nuclear fusion. The relationship between plasma pressure and magnetic field pressure is also noted as a method for estimating plasma density.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear fusion principles
  • Familiarity with plasma physics concepts
  • Knowledge of ion temperature and density metrics
  • Basic grasp of magnetic field interactions in plasma confinement
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest findings on KSTAR's plasma composition and operational parameters
  • Explore the implications of ion density on fusion efficiency
  • Study the relationship between plasma pressure and magnetic field strength in fusion devices
  • Investigate advancements in fusion technology and materials used in high-temperature plasma environments
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in nuclear fusion, plasma physicists, and engineers involved in the development of fusion technology will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on optimizing plasma conditions for sustained fusion reactions.

jimgraber
Gold Member
Messages
247
Reaction score
18
TL;DR
How close is Kstar to breakeven now?
Here is link to recent result: https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-12/nrco-kas122420.php (20 seconds at 100,000 C)
I have googled but can't find triple product or anything similar. TIA if you can.
I assume this result was from a run with ordinary hydrogen, no deuterium or tritium.
But I think the equivalent DT values are frequently calculated. Is this possible here?
TIA again
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Eurekalert news release wasn't clear. It mentions hydrogen once, "To re-create fusion reactions that occur in the sun on Earth, hydrogen isotopes must be placed inside a fusion device like KSTAR to create a plasma state where ions and electrons are separated, and ions must be heated and maintained at high temperatures." That is not helpful. They don't explicitly mention the plasma composition.

The press release states, "it succeeded in continuous operation of plasma for 20 seconds with an ion-temperature higher than 100 million degrees, which is one of the core conditions of nuclear fusion in the 2020 KSTAR Plasma Campaign." Well, OK, yeah, but . . . .

https://www.kfe.re.kr/eng/pageView/103 - indicates H, D-D, which doesn't clarify the matter, but I would suspect that they used H2.

https://www.kfe.re.kr/eng/post/paper_eng - page lists paper lead authors and titles, but not linked to pdfs. Disappointing! I found one paper in Journal of Nuclear Materials by typing in lead author's name and title.

OK, so we have 20 sec at 1E08 K (~8.6 keV), but don't know the ion density.
 
  • Informative
Likes berkeman
Thanks for the references
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I saw a number in a paper that was 1019 m-3 (or 1013 cm-3) for ion density, but that's more or less a ball park figure. A number between 1013 and 1014 cm-3 would be typical, that latter being 10 times the pressure at the same temperature. Usually, as the temperature increases, the ion and electron densities decrease, as the system is limited by pressure, which is limited by the maximum magnetic field strength.

One could possibly estimate the plasma density by equating the plasma pressure with the magnetic field pressure (force), which is proportional to B2, and use the toroidal field magnetic flux density, Bθ, as an approximation.
 
Last edited:
Hello, I am designing an X-ray irradiator with MCNP simulation. But I am still in confusion, whether my X-ray housing will be a box or a cylinder. If the box (macrobody identifier of MCNP) is required, I am trying to match the dimension as that of the cylinder, i,e, the height will be that of the cylinder height, and the other two dimensions will be that of the radius of the cylinder (surface 52 and 53). Can anybody please help me define the surfaces? Below is my attached text file. Forgot...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K