Lab writeup, resonance & speed of sound

Click For Summary
The lab involves using an adjustable tube and tuning forks to explore the relationship between frequency and wavelength, specifically at the point of resonance where sound is loudest. Graphing frequency against 1/lambda (the inverse of wavelength) reveals that wavelength is inversely proportional to frequency, which is crucial for understanding sound speed. The slope of this graph represents the speed of sound in the medium used during the experiment. Using 1/lambda allows for a direct measurement of wave number, simplifying the calculation of sound speed. This approach highlights the fundamental relationship between frequency, wavelength, and sound velocity in your lab writeup.
SphericalStrife
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
ok I'm definitely having trouble with this lab due tomorrow. We did a lab in class where you get an adjustable tube and use different tuning forks. With the different frequencies of the forks we adjusted the tubes until it reached resonance? (loudess point) Alright so we got a bunch of numbers and when it came down to it we were asked to graph the frequencies vs. 1/lamda, 1/lamda being the inverse of lamda. For my lab writeup I need to explain why we graphed this frequency vs. lamda. Now i know when i graph it, the slope of this Linear line is the velocity of sound in my experiment. I need to understand the significance of why we're graphing with 1/lamda...

What is 1/lamda vs. frequency?

frequency = oscillations/second, 1/length of wavelength
so what I'm getting is
oscillations/second*wavelength?
What is that??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SphericalStrife said:
ok I'm definitely having trouble with this lab due tomorrow. We did a lab in class where you get an adjustable tube and use different tuning forks. With the different frequencies of the forks we adjusted the tubes until it reached resonance? (loudess point) Alright so we got a bunch of numbers and when it came down to it we were asked to graph the frequencies vs. 1/lamda, 1/lamda being the inverse of lamda. For my lab writeup I need to explain why we graphed this frequency vs. lamda. Now i know when i graph it, the slope of this Linear line is the velocity of sound in my experiment. I need to understand the significance of why we're graphing with 1/lamda...

What is 1/lamda vs. frequency?

frequency = oscillations/second, 1/length of wavelength
so what I'm getting is
oscillations/second*wavelength?
What is that??


Hi,

you are showing that wavelength(lamda) is inversely proportional to frequency.

And lastly, that the speed of sound is constant, for a given medium, from the formula speed = (lamda )wavelength* frequency(hz)
 



The lab you described is investigating the relationship between frequency and wavelength in determining the speed of sound. By using an adjustable tube and tuning forks of different frequencies, you were able to find the point of resonance where the sound produced was the loudest. This resonance occurs when the frequency of the tuning fork matches the natural frequency of the tube.

To explain why the graph was created using 1/lambda vs. frequency, it is important to understand the relationship between frequency, wavelength, and speed of sound. The speed of sound can be calculated by multiplying the frequency and wavelength, as shown in the equation v = f * lambda. Therefore, the slope of the graph of 1/lambda vs. frequency will represent the speed of sound in your experiment.

But why use 1/lambda instead of just lambda? This is because 1/lambda is known as the wave number, which is a unit used to measure the number of waves per unit length. By graphing 1/lambda instead of lambda, the slope of the graph will directly represent the wave number, which in turn represents the speed of sound.

In other words, the graph of 1/lambda vs. frequency allows for a direct measurement of the wave number and subsequently the speed of sound, without having to perform additional calculations.

To answer your question, 1/lambda vs. frequency represents the relationship between the wave number and frequency, which can then be used to determine the speed of sound in your experiment. I hope this helps clarify the significance of this graph in your lab writeup. Good luck!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
24K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K