Determining the velocity of sound in the air by the resonance method

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around measuring the velocity of sound in air using a tuning fork and a pipe closed at one end. The original poster outlines two methods: applying an end correction to the first resonant length and determining the second resonant length to find the wavelength of sound. Equipment mentioned includes PVC tubing of varying diameters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster raises several questions regarding measurement uncertainty, suitable tuning fork frequencies, predictions for third resonance lengths, and the rationale behind not applying the end correction factor in the second part of the investigation.

Discussion Status

Some participants prompt the original poster to reflect on their questions and emphasize the need for demonstrating effort before receiving assistance. There appears to be a lack of clarity regarding the experiment, with one participant expressing uncertainty and seeking examples for better understanding.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has not yet provided results for the second method and is grappling with the concepts involved in the experiment.

mjdom
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



measure the velocity of sound in the air using tuning fork and a pipe closed at one end

method a: End Correction involves applying a correction factor to the first resonant length based on the diameter of the tube used.

method b: Second Resonant Length involves finding two successive resonant lengths of the air column within the pipe. The distance between these points represents half a wavelength of the resonance frequency.

equipment - two lengths of PVC tubing of 30mm and 50mm diameter

Homework Equations



Le= L + 0.29d
wavelength of the sound = 2x (L2-L1)

The Attempt at a Solution



questions i want to ask,,

- list the main source of measurement uncertainty
- what frequencies of tuning forks is more suitable
- predict third resonance length for each tuning fork used in method b
- what value you would expect in substracting the second resonant length from thr third resonant length?
- expain why the end correction factor is not applied in the second part of the investigation
- reason for measuring air temperature inside the pipe[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
diameter of tubes 50mm - first resonant length L (m) : 0.304 / effective length Le (m) : 0.318 / wavelength 4 x Le (m): 1.274 / velocity : 326.14

diameter of tubes 30mm - first resonant length L (m) : 0.33 / effective length Le (m) : 0.338 / wavelength 4 x Le (m): 1.354 / velocity : 346.14

fork 1 frequency : 256

i havnt got result for method 2...
 
Questions are not attempts at solutions. What are your thoughts on each of your questions? You need to show some effort before help can be given.
 
gneill said:
Questions are not attempts at solutions. What are your thoughts on each of your questions? You need to show some effort before help can be given.
i know but to be honest i have no idea about this experiment.. can u give some examples? so i can get some idea
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K