MHB Lachlan's question via email about the Bisection Method

AI Thread Summary
The Bisection Method is applied to the equation 8cos(x) = e^(-x/7) by rewriting it as f(x) = 8cos(x) - e^(-x/7) = 0. Four iterations within the interval [1.35, 1.6] yield an approximate solution of x ≈ 1.45938. Calculations were verified using Excel, confirming the results. Further iterations suggest a refined solution of x ≈ 1.4701171875. The importance of using Radian mode on the calculator is emphasized for accurate results.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
Consider the equation $\displaystyle 8\cos{\left( x \right) } = \mathrm{e}^{-x/7} $.

Perform four iterations of the Bisection Method to find an approximate solution in the interval $\displaystyle x \in \left[ 1.35, 1.6 \right] $.

The Bisection Method is used to solve equations of the form $\displaystyle f\left( x \right) = 0 $, so we need to rewrite the equation as $\displaystyle 8\cos{ \left( x \right) } - \mathrm{e}^{-x/7} = 0 $. Thus $\displaystyle f\left( x \right) = 8\cos{ \left( x \right) } - \mathrm{e}^{-x/7} $.

I have used my CAS to solve this problem. Note that the calculator must be in Radian mode.

View attachment 9640

View attachment 9641

View attachment 9642

So our solution is $\displaystyle x \approx c_4 = 1.45938 $.
 

Attachments

  • bm1.jpg
    bm1.jpg
    23.4 KB · Views: 150
  • bm2.jpg
    bm2.jpg
    21.9 KB · Views: 151
  • bm3.jpg
    bm3.jpg
    21.6 KB · Views: 130
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I checked your calculations using Excel, and they agree. After a couple more iterations I get x≈1,4701171875.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top