Lack of quantum effects at higher temperatures

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the absence of quantum effects in liquids and gases at room temperature. One viewpoint suggests that high momentum at room temperature leads to small de Broglie wavelengths, preventing quantum interference. Conversely, the article indicates that quantum effects diminish due to particles being out of phase, particularly at low temperatures. It is noted that while both explanations have merit, the phase relationship of wavelengths primarily influences behavior at very low temperatures, far from typical room conditions. Ultimately, the interplay of temperature and particle behavior determines the classical nature of these states.
trelek2
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I readhttp://www.learner.org/courses/physics/unit/text.html?unit=6&secNum=6" article and started wondering: What is the real reason for classical behavior of liquids gases at room temp?

I have always thought that it is because of the deBroigle wavelength relation. At room T particles have a high momentum and so their wavelengths are very small in comparison with separation between atoms of the fluid. Therefore we don't have quantum interference and no quantum effects?

But in the article (the very last 2 paragraphs) they seem to be saying that the quantum effects vanish because particle wavelengths are out of phase with one another.

Which version of the story is true? Or which truth is more veracious?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What they are saying is that as you heat up and oscillating BEC the oscillations begin to dampen out because the heat causes the particles to interfere with each other instead of reinforce the oscillations. This is only occurring at very very low temperatures, far from room temperature. Both effects you list do happen, but the phase of the wavelengths only matters at extremely low temperatures.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
135
Views
11K
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K