I Ladder operators and SU(2) representation

  • Thread starter kelly0303
  • Start date
109
7
Hello! I read in many places the derivation of the representation for SU(2) using ladder operators and in all of the places they say that, due to the fact that we are looking for a finite dimensional representation, the ladder must end at a point, hence why we have an eigenvector of ##L_3## (usually) such that, when acted on with the raising operator gives zero, and the same for the lowering operator. I didn't find an explanation as to why this must be unique. From a physics point of view it makes sense, as you have an irreducible representation of a spin J particle, so in order for the representation to allow for all the spin-z component, all the eigenvectors must have a different eigenvalue, hence why you have just one eigenvector at the top and at the bottom, and in general for any eigenvalue of ##L_3##, but I am not sure I understand mathematically, why can't you have more than one vector with the same eigenvalue in an irrep of SU(2). Can someone help me? Thank you!
 

fresh_42

Mentor
Insights Author
2018 Award
11,411
7,824
Hello! I read in many places the derivation of the representation for SU(2) using ladder operators and in all of the places they say that, due to the fact that we are looking for a finite dimensional representation, the ladder must end at a point, hence why we have an eigenvector of ##L_3## (usually) such that, when acted on with the raising operator gives zero, and the same for the lowering operator. I didn't find an explanation as to why this must be unique. From a physics point of view it makes sense, as you have an irreducible representation of a spin J particle, so in order for the representation to allow for all the spin-z component, all the eigenvectors must have a different eigenvalue, hence why you have just one eigenvector at the top and at the bottom, and in general for any eigenvalue of ##L_3##, but I am not sure I understand mathematically, why can't you have more than one vector with the same eigenvalue in an irrep of SU(2). Can someone help me? Thank you!
You can find the underlying theorem (7.1.) here: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/journey-manifold-su2-part-ii/
For the mathematical derivation I recommend [6] in the sources. The main reason is, that all invariant subspaces are one-dimensional, and the upper triangular matrix shifts those subspaces one place higher, the lower triangular one place less.
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Ladder operators and SU(2) representation" You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: Ladder operators and SU(2) representation

  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
897
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top