Undergrad Solve Lagrange Multiplier Mystery: ∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj = ∂N/∂Nj=0

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of Lagrange multipliers in the context of constraints, specifically addressing the derivatives of the sum of variables and a constant. It highlights the confusion regarding the derivatives, where ∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj equals 1 while ∂N/∂Nj equals 0, leading to apparent contradictions. The key point is that constraints indicate interdependence among variables, meaning that differentiating them as independent leads to incorrect conclusions. The clarification emphasizes that when one variable decreases, another must increase to maintain the constant total. Understanding this relationship resolves the ambiguity surrounding the differentiation of constrained variables.
kidsasd987
Messages
142
Reaction score
4
Hi, I have a question about lagrange multiplier

Let's say we are given with the following constraints

Σ{Ni}=N and Σ{NiEi}=total energy. N and total energy are constants by definition.
if we take the derivative with respect to Nj,

∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj=∂N/∂Nj
where i=j, ∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj=1 and ∂N/∂Nj = 0 because N is constant.

On slide 14, it says ∂N/∂Nj = 0 while ∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj=1 with the preceding constraint Σ{Ni}=N.
Then, we can conclude

∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj= ∂N/∂Nj=0.

This is quite ambiguous to me.
if we assume we have a constraint x1+x2+x3..+xn=const.

partial of this constraint with respect to xj will be 1=0 therefore it is contradiction.
how shoud I interpret this?
 

Attachments

  • 스크린샷 2016-11-29 오후 12.40.40.png
    스크린샷 2016-11-29 오후 12.40.40.png
    71.6 KB · Views: 486
  • 스크린샷 2016-11-29 오후 12.40.37.png
    스크린샷 2016-11-29 오후 12.40.37.png
    71.3 KB · Views: 491
  • 스크린샷 2016-11-29 오후 12.44.39.png
    스크린샷 2016-11-29 오후 12.44.39.png
    51.2 KB · Views: 493
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A constraint means that your variables are not independent from each other. So when I have ## x_1+x_2+\dots+x_n=const ##, it means when I decrease one of the ##x##s, another increases to maintain the constant. But the way you differentiate it, you assume they're independent variables which is a wrong assumption.
 
ShayanJ said:
A constraint means that your variables are not independent from each other. So when I have ## x_1+x_2+\dots+x_n=const ##, it means when I decrease one of the ##x##s, another increases to maintain the constant. But the way you differentiate it, you assume they're independent variables which is a wrong assumption.

hmm I get it thanks .
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K