MHB Lagrange's Identity and Cauhchy-Schwarz Inequality for complex numbers

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality and Lagrange's Identity in the context of complex analysis, particularly as presented in Marsden's "Basic Complex Analysis." The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality is recognized for its significance in validating the geometric interpretation of complex numbers as vectors and establishing the angle between them. In contrast, Lagrange's Identity appears to have fewer applications in complex analysis, with its relevance more aligned with algebraic contexts, such as exterior algebra. Participants express confusion over the importance of Lagrange's Identity, noting a lack of practical examples in their studies. Overall, the conversation highlights the foundational role of the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality while questioning the utility of Lagrange's Identity in complex analysis.
rmcknigh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I guess the best way to start this is by admitting that my conceptual understanding of the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality and the Lagrange Identity, as the title suggests, is not as deep as it could be.

I'm working through Marsden's 3e "Basic Complex Analysis" and it contains a proof of the Cauchy Schwarz Inequality using what it calls a clever math trick- manipulating $$\sum_{k=1}^n\mid z_k-d\bar{w_k}\mid^2$$ where $$z_k,w_k\in\mathbb{C} \ \forall \ k \ s.t. \ 1\leq k \leq n$$ and $$d=\frac{\sum_{k=1}^n{z_kw_k}}{\sum_{k=1}^n{ \mid w_k\mid^2}}$$. Then, as an exercise, we are asked to prove Lagrange's Identity and then deduce the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality from it.

Although these aren't extremely difficult proofs, I don't understand what's so important about them that I can't find anything else in either the supplement or index of the Marsden text that uses these results at all .

I'm pretty sure that the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality is important because it validates the definition of the angle between two complex vectors. Or perhaps restated, it solidifies the geometric interpretation of complex numbers as vectors.

But what about Lagrange's Identity? I'm having trouble finding applications of this to complex analysis besides a few different proofs of it, and its implication of the Cauchy Schwarz Inequality.

Halp.

Anthony
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rmcknigh said:
I'm pretty sure that the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality is important because it validates the definition of the angle between two complex vectors. Or perhaps restated, it solidifies the geometric interpretation of complex numbers as vectors.

But what about Lagrange's Identity? I'm having trouble finding applications of this to complex analysis besides a few different proofs of it, and its implication of the Cauchy Schwarz Inequality.
Hi Anthony and welcome to MHB!

The Cauchy–Schwarz inequality is absolutely central to the study of inner-product spaces. To take just one example, it gives the most natural proof of the triangle inequality $\|a+b\|\leqslant \|a\| + \|b\|$. But I have to admit that in 50 years of doing complex and functional analysis I have never until now come across Lagrange's inequality, so I'm not surprised that you are having trouble finding applications of it. According to Lagrange's identity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, it crops up in exterior algebra, so it seems that maybe it is more of an algebraic than an analytical tool.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K