Lagrangian for the General Relativity

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Lagrangian formulation of General Relativity, specifically the Einstein-Hilbert action represented by L = R, where R is the Ricci scalar. The conversation highlights the need for a full Lagrangian that incorporates matter, expressed as L = L_G + L_M. An example provided includes the electromagnetic field, leading to the action S = ∫ *R - 1/2 ∫ F ∧ *F. Variational principles applied to this Lagrangian yield the Einstein field equations, linking the geometry of spacetime to matter through the energy-momentum tensor Tμν. The exchange of insights emphasizes the importance of combining gravitational and matter Lagrangians in deriving fundamental equations of physics.
MManuel Abad
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I've always found that the lagrangian for the Gravitational field is that from the Einstein-Hilbert action:

<i>L</i>=R (R is the Ricci scalar; I'm not including the factor of \sqrt{-g})

but when variational principles are applied, we get the vacuum field equations (obviously). I'd like someone to tell me which would be the FULL lagrangian (with matter coupled) for getting the Einstein's field equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You simply take the gravitational Lagrangian density and add in the Lagrangian density of the matter fields: L=L_G+L_M.
 
For example, if you have electromagnetic fields, then the action is

S = \int \ast \mathcal{R} - \frac12 \int F \wedge \ast F

where \ast is the Hodge dual and F is the electromagnetic 2-form (rescaled up to some factors of 2\pi which I don't remember...I use the above normalization in my research). Using the normalization I've given here and varying with respect to the inverse metric, you obtain

R_{\mu\nu} - \frac12 \mathcal{R} g_{\mu\nu} = \frac12 T_{\mu\nu}

where

T_{\mu\nu} = F_{\mu\rho} F_\nu{}^\rho - \frac14 g_{\mu\nu} F_{\rho\sigma} F^{\rho\sigma}
 
Wow, thankyou both, that was very useful! :)
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
805
Replies
3
Views
1K