Lagrangian of a Photon: Understanding the Fundamental Particle in Light

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter exmarine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Photon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Lagrangian of a photon, exploring its theoretical implications, calculations of action, and the relationship between photons and the electromagnetic field. Participants engage with concepts from quantum field theory and classical field theory, including the Proca Lagrangian and the action principle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the existence of a specific Lagrangian for a photon, suggesting it may simply be represented by \( h \nu \).
  • Another participant asserts that the Lagrangian for massless spin-1 particles is the Proca Lagrangian, which leads to the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations when \( m=0 \) is applied.
  • A different viewpoint states that photons are quantum excitations of the electromagnetic field, which has its own Lagrangian, rather than having a Lagrangian defined for photons themselves.
  • One participant provides a mathematical expression for the Lagrangian of the electromagnetic field, indicating it includes a kinetic term.
  • Several participants inquire about calculating the action for a photon, with one suggesting that the action cannot be computed for a photon directly, but rather for the electromagnetic field as a whole.
  • There are repeated references to Feynman & Hibbs, indicating a reliance on specific equations from the text to support claims about action and amplitude calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether a specific Lagrangian for photons exists, with some asserting that photons do not have a Lagrangian while others argue for the existence of a related Lagrangian through the electromagnetic field. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differing perspectives on calculating action and amplitudes.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific equations from Feynman & Hibbs, indicating a reliance on external texts for clarification. There are also indications of confusion regarding the assumptions made in the discussion, particularly about the availability of resources and definitions used in the context of the Lagrangian and action.

exmarine
Messages
241
Reaction score
11
I can't find this in any textbook, so I must not understand something about it. What is the Lagrangian of a photon? Would it be just h*nu?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Photons have Spin 1. The general Lagrangian for Spin 1 particles is called the Proca Lagrangian and if put into the Euler Lagrange euquation yields the Proca equation. In addition, photons are massless. Therefore putting $m=0$ in the Proco yields the correct Lagrangian for photons. If you put this Lagrangian (i.e. the Proca with $m=0$ ) into the Euler Lagrange equation you get the inhomogeneous Maxwell equation.

You can find the Lagrangian, for example, here
 
There is no such thing as the lagrangian of a photon. Photons are quantum excitations of the electromagnetic field, which has a Lagrangian, essentially the lagrangian quoted by unknown1111.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
massless spin-1 = photon, carry only a kinitic term in L ;\begin{equation}

L=-\frac{1}{4}F^{2}=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}=-\frac{1}{4}(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu})^{2}

\end{equation}
 
OK, then how does one calculate the action (S) for the amplitude of a photon?

phi = (const) exp[(i/h_bar)S]
 
exmarine said:
OK, then how does one calculate the action (S) for the amplitude of a photon?
Which part of
Orodruin said:
There is no such thing as the lagrangian of a photon. Photons are quantum excitations of the electromagnetic field,
was unclear? You need to specify exactly what it is you are trying to do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
Feynman & Hibbs, p. 29, eqn 2.15:
 
I can't seem to get the eqn editor to work.

Feynman & Hibbs, p.29, eqn 2.15: phi[x(t)] = const e^(I/h-bar)S[x(t)]

p.26: S = integral[L(x-dot,x,t) dt]

So if a photon has no Lagrangian, how does one calculate the action, amplitude, probability, etc. for a photon?
 
exmarine said:
So if a photon has no Lagrangian, how does one calculate the action, amplitude, probability, etc. for a photon?
You don't. You compute the action of the electromagnetic field and correlation functions (essentially amplitudes) between different excitations of the field.
 
  • #10
exmarine said:
Feynman & Hibbs, p. 29, eqn 2.15:

Also, you are here assuming that we have the book available and ready to open. This is not getting us anywhere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K