Language fails that make you angry

  • Context: Lingusitics 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KingNothing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Language
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
Sign up Log in
241 replies · 35K views
English, she be a evolving , and them there fails will be part of a properly spoken language in the years to come..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are some more:

advise vs. advice: "advise" is a verb; "advice" is a noun.

everyday vs. every day: "everyday" is an adjective meaning "commonplace". "every day" is an adverbial phrase meaning "daily".

Also a whole slew of words ending in -ant vs. -ent, e.g. "relevant", "independent"...these are often mixed up.

i.e. vs. e.g.: "i.e." stands for "id est", meaning "that is"; it should be followed by a paraphrase or something explanatory. "e.g." stands for "exempli gratia", meaning "for the sake of example", and should be followed by a list of examples.

I think the word with the most variety is "definitely". In addition to what's already been posted, let's not forget "definantly".

Edited to add "heighth" and "weighth". Should I start saying "breadt" and "widt" to such people?
 
Last edited:
- the point is mute (instead of moot)

- I'm glad the word 'solution' has ceased being treated as a verb. For a few years (at least in business), people of been 'solutioning' problems.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
hotvette said:
- the point is mute (instead of moot)
+1

"The point is moo -
- a cow's opinion. It just doesn't matter. It's moo."
Joey Tribbianni

:biggrin:
 
This might not exactly fit in with the others, but my pet peeve is when people say over-exaggerate. I've lost many arguments related to this before, as it has shown up in a dictionary or two. The redundancy kills me. It just gets me over-overwhelmed...
 
dacruick said:
This might not exactly fit in with the others, but my pet peeve is when people say over-exaggerate. I've lost many arguments related to this before, as it has shown up in a dictionary or two. The redundancy kills me. It just gets me over-overwhelmed...
You should redouble your efforts to remain calm.
 
If I've told you once I've told you a million times - don't hyperbolize!

(OK, not a real one.)
 
DaveC426913 said:
You should redouble your efforts to remain calm.

How do you know I doubled them already? I think the only option for me is to play it by year.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Huh. Learn something new every day.
I didn't know this either. I was just checking to see if the "misuse" had finally become acceptable, as often happens. Turns out it actually preceded the "proper" use in acceptability.
 
hotvette said:
- I'm glad the word 'solution' has ceased being treated as a verb. For a few years (at least in business), people of been 'solutioning' problems.

I wish we could get rid of a few more noun-to-verb conversions, such as "to gift."

cnhVerbingWeirdsLanguage.jpg
 
vela said:
The one that really used to bug me is its vs. it's.
I write "it's" for both more often than any other living English speaker. The idea that a possessive must have an apostrophe + s seems to over ride all other considerations.
 
zoobyshoe said:
I write "it's" for both more often than any other living English speaker. The idea that a possessive must have an apostrophe + s seems to over ride all other considerations.

Same here! Although, microsoft word has been training me over the past few years to remember so now I'm pretty good I think.

The one that I hate to mess up is their vs they're. It makes you look ultra stupid when you screw it up.
 
dacruick said:
Same here! Although, microsoft word has been training me over the past few years to remember so now I'm pretty good I think.

The one that I hate to mess up is their vs they're. It makes you look ultra stupid when you screw it up.
I have their, there, and they're pretty well separated in my mind. "It's" is the one that I have to keep conscious track of. "It's" would be right for the possessive were it not for the existence of the contraction, which has to be kept separate. "Its" requires you to break a perfectly good rule in order to accommodate another situation.
 
My current #1 annoyance is the repeated use of 'like'. It's almost as bad as 'you know'. Interesting that it's a verbal thing only, not written.
 
zoobyshoe said:
"Its" requires you to break a perfectly good rule in order to accommodate another situation.
Not really. You don't say I's, you's, he's, she's, we's, or they's either. Possessive for pronouns never followed the apostrophe-s rule.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Pengwuino said:
It is my understanding that the ongoing debate is whether or not English is actually a language.
Yep, it's actually a dialect of European. :-p
 
256bits said:
The post could also be "language fails that make you mad" as in crazy?

How much is this site US, how much UK and how much other?

Many of these complaints must surely be particular to one side or another.

Because of the seeming US majority I found myself using in my very last post the expression "loused up" thinking to be better understood. On reflection I hope it's not too rude. I picked that up long long ago from Dean Martin's "Who loused up the house?" in the film "Some Came Running". In context that came across very funny to English.

A word that irritated me when first here was 'awesome!' Vivid and witty first time, then becomes a tiresome cliché that devalues a word. However I think it has worn off now and seems not to be heard so often.
 
vela said:
Not really. You don't say I's, you's, he's, she's, we's, or they's either. Possessive for pronouns never followed the apostrophe-s rule.

Oh yes you do, in some parts of the UK, as abbreviations for "I am" "You are" etc. Not to menton future tenses like "I be'll going to London tomorrow" (I will be...)

The apostrophe s was originally an abbreviation for "his", i.e "John his book" (or more likely "John hys boke") became "John's book". But I don't think a book was ever described by saying "it his cover is red".
 
My biggest peeve is spelling not grammar. Specifically, US computer programmers writing spell checkers, who think British English words end in -ise not -ize. They should check the Oxford English Dictionary some time. The "-ize" spelling goes back hundreds of years in the UK, apart from a few exceptions.
 
jtbell said:
I wish we could get rid of a few more noun-to-verb conversions, such as "to gift."

cnhVerbingWeirdsLanguage.jpg
My signature!
l
l
l
l
l
l
v
 
vela said:
Not really. You don't say I's, you's, he's, she's, we's, or they's either. Possessive for pronouns never followed the apostrophe-s rule.
Because all the other pronouns have a distinct genitive form. "It" doesn't. "Its" is a fake genitive, adopted just to distinguish it from the contraction "it's".
 
AlephZero said:
My biggest peeve is spelling not grammar. Specifically, US computer programmers writing spell checkers, who think British English words end in -ise not -ize. They should check the Oxford English Dictionary some time. The "-ize" spelling goes back hundreds of years in the UK, apart from a few exceptions.
You ought to write a British English spell check program and sell it over there.
 
epenguin said:
A word that irritated me when first here was 'awesome!' Vivid and witty first time, then becomes a tiresome cliché that devalues a word. However I think it has worn off now and seems not to be heard so often.
There's always a current word for what is meant by "awesome". When I was a kid it was "groovy". Any remotely positive reaction was rendered as "groovy". There have been a few others in the years in between. "Fly" and "phat" didn't have such long runs. I can't think of the others.
 
There have been others, but groovy was a good one.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
AlephZero said:
The apostrophe s was originally an abbreviation for "his", i.e "John his book" (or more likely "John hys boke") became "John's book". But I don't think a book was ever described by saying "it his cover is red".

This is a common myth, invented in the 17th or 18th century. It is completely false.

The -s ending for the genitive has been around for thousands of years, and has cognates in Germanic, Norse, Latin (Old Latin, as in pater familias), Sanskrit and Proto-Indo-European.

There is no good reason for the possessive case to have an apostrophe at all. Genitives in German add -s with no apostrophe, and there is no difficulty understanding the meaning. Perhaps in English we have become too uncomfortable with case endings, so we pretend we don't actually have them.
 
zoobyshoe said:
There's always a current word for what is meant by "awesome". When I was a kid it was "groovy". Any remotely positive reaction was rendered as "groovy". There have been a few others in the years in between. "Fly" and "phat" didn't have such long runs. I can't think of the others.

Bad. Sick. Trick. Wicked.
 
lisab said:
Wicked.

Oh god. My kids were wicked this and wicked that for years...
 
Wicked had a long solid run in Maine, and is still current in some areas. "Wicked Good" is still really popular when describing food, music, or other intangibles when words fail.