Laplace & Fourier: When to Use?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amaresh92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier Laplace
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Laplace transform is utilized for analyzing systems in the complex plane, particularly effective for studying poles and zeros in response to impulses, while the Fourier transform focuses on oscillations in the frequency domain, ideal for examining harmonic content in periodic signals. The double-sided Laplace transform is mathematically identical to the continuous Fourier transform when substituting s = jω. Certain signals, such as the unit step function, are more easily transformed using the Laplace method due to convergence issues that may arise with the Fourier transform. Both transforms share a common mathematical foundation, influenced by the nature of the signal and its time or frequency domain representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transform and its applications
  • Familiarity with Fourier transform and its uses in signal analysis
  • Knowledge of complex analysis, particularly the complex plane
  • Basic concepts of signal convergence and integral properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the Laplace transform in control systems
  • Explore the Fourier transform's role in signal processing and harmonic analysis
  • Learn about convergence criteria for both Laplace and Fourier transforms
  • Investigate the relationship between the Z Transform and the Discrete-Time Fourier Transform
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those in control systems and signal processing, as well as mathematicians interested in transform theory.

amaresh92
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
greetings,

Can anyone tell me when we should use Laplace transform and Fourier transform? It seems both of them are equal except σ .

thanks in advanced.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The Laplace transform resolves a function into moments in the complex plane. It is best used in studies that involve the poles and zeros of a response, such as the exponential responses to an impulse.

The Fourier transform resolves a function into oscillations in the frequency domain. It is best used for the study of harmonic content and phase in repeating signals.

Laplace maps to the complex plane while Fourier maps to the frequency domain. You use the one that takes you from the time domain to your preferred domain for analysis or manipulation.
 
Balun, you can just as well (or better) say that "Laplace maps to the entire complex plane while Fourier maps to the j \omega axis of the complex plane."

it is true that the double-sided Laplace transform is identical to the continuous Fourier transform with the substitution that s = j \omega.

there are some signals that, without handwaving, are hard to F.T. while they are easy to L.T. e.g. the unit step function, u(t). there are issues of convergence and the conditions to get either the Laplace integral or the Fourier integral to converge to a finite result. but where these issues are identical for both the F.T. and L.T. (such as for x(t) = e^{-\alpha t} u(t)), then the transformed result must be the same between the F.T. and L.T. with the substitution of s = j \omega.

a similar relationship exists between the Z Transform and the Discrete-Time Fourier Transform. one exists in the entire complex z plane while the other exists on the unit circle of the same z plane, where z = e^{j \omega}.

there is a common mathematical underpinning to all of these transforms. it depends on whether your signal in the time or frequency domain is discrete or not. whether you can get the integral to converge or not. whether you define your signals and linear systems to exist before t=0 or not (that affects the double or single-sidedness of the integral or summation).
 
rbj; I can agree with everything you write.
I am not a mathematician so it is mostly beyond me.
After three days, amaresh92's question deserved a reply.
So I threw in an answer in the hope that it would stimulate some response.
Now 4 days later, I am enlightened by your interesting reply. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
18K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
893
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K