Launch of the Sspace Shuttle and its effect on the Earth's motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter EMguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Launch Motion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the theoretical effects of launching a space shuttle on the Earth's motion, specifically focusing on the implications of the mass change of the Earth due to the shuttle's launch. Participants consider the effects on kinetic energy, momentum, and velocity, while also questioning the terminology used to describe these effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that launching a space shuttle decreases the Earth's mass, leading to theoretical effects on its kinetic energy, momentum, and velocity.
  • There is a question about whether the effects of the mass change are real or merely theoretical, with some participants emphasizing that the effects are indeed real but minuscule.
  • One participant assumes that momentum remains constant due to the lack of recoil effects from the gas pillar, suggesting that the velocity of the Earth would increase with the decreased mass.
  • Another participant asks about the components of momentum and whether they remain unchanged, raising the question of the direction of the rocket's launch and its potential impact on the results.
  • A separate scenario is introduced involving two bricks in orbit, questioning whether removing one brick would double the orbital velocity of the remaining brick.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the terminology used to describe the effects of launching the shuttle, particularly regarding the use of "theoretical" versus "minuscule." The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific calculations and implications of the mass change on Earth's motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached consensus on the calculations related to kinetic energy, momentum, and velocity changes, and there are unresolved questions about the assumptions made regarding the gas pillar and the direction of the rocket's launch.

EMguy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Assume we shoot a space shuttle of mass m to space. We know it affects the Earth's mass M by decreasing it to M2 = M-m. Assume that the gas pillar that the space shuttle shoots has no effects on earth, what would be the theoretical effects on kinetic energy, momentum and velocity of the Earth by the decreased mass, although miniscule obviously?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EMguy said:
Assume we shoot a space shuttle of mass m to space. We know it affects the Earth's mass M by decreasing it to M2 = M-m. Assume that the gas pillar that the space shuttle shoots has no effects on earth, what would be the theoretical effects on kinetic energy, momentum and velocity of the Earth by the decreased mass, although miniscule obviously?
Can you do any of these calculations yourself? And why do you say "theoretical"? Do you not believe that the effects would be real?
 
phinds said:
Can you do any of these calculations yourself? And why do you say "theoretical"? Do you not believe that the effects would be real?
I would assume that the momentum remained constant cause of the assumption of gas pillar having no effect, i.e no recoil effects? Then velocity would be increased with the decreased mass? Correct? Incorrect?

And by theoretical i mean real... just theoretical relating to the effects being miniscule.
 
EMguy said:
I would assume that the momentum remained constant cause of the assumption of gas pillar having no effect, i.e no recoil effects?
What are the components of momentum? Do they stay the same?

Then velocity would be increased with the decreased mass? Correct? Incorrect?
Would it matter in what direction the rocket was launched?

And by theoretical i mean real... just theoretical relating to the effects being miniscule.
OK, but that's poor terminology. If you mean minuscule, SAY minuscule.
 
Two bricks tied together are in a circular orbit around the earth. You don a space suit, carefully untie the string and remove one of the bricks without disturbing the other. Does the undisturbed brick double its orbital velocity as a result?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
981