Learning about condensed matter physics as a particle physicist

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relevance of studying semiconductor physics and condensed matter physics for a master's student focused on nuclear and particle physics. The student expresses concern that additional knowledge in these areas may not be necessary for their career goals, particularly since their primary interest lies in particle physics. They contemplate whether taking courses in superfluidity and superconductivity would be beneficial or a waste of time, given that most industry roles may not require extensive expertise in condensed matter physics. Responses highlight that while specialized knowledge can be advantageous for academic careers, the key skills developed during the master's program—particularly problem-solving abilities—are often more valuable to industry employers. Many students in particle physics have successfully transitioned to industry roles without extensive condensed matter coursework, suggesting that foundational knowledge can still be useful in various job settings.
orochi
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
I am on my first year of my master's degree in nuclear and particle physics, and right now i am ending my first semester, where i decided to take a course in physics of semiconductors. As i end this semester i start to wonder if there was any use in learning about this subject, as it seems like any type of work in this field would require a lot more learning about this subject and in condensed matter physics in general.

Learning that, i do not intend to do it as my main focus is particle physics, not condensed matter physics. And for the next semester i initially thought about taking a course in superfluidity and superconductivity, but i am afraid that it will just be a waste of time.

My goal was to learn about these subjects so that i could have the option of finding work outside of particle physics, but i am starting to wonder if all that knowledge will go to waste because any type of work in these field (in industry or academic research) would require me to pretty much become a condensed matter phycisist. Am i right on this or could i actually find a work, problably in the industry, where this "basic" knowledge would be usefull?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
As a particle physicist I have seen many students end up in industry jobs without doing any condensed matter physics apart from the basic courses. The main skill you learn that will be attractive to industry employers will not be your subject knowledge but your skills in tackling difficult problems. Of course, there may be jobs where a subject knowledge may be beneficial, but in my experience that is much more relevant if you wish to pursue an academic carreer.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and orochi
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top