Learning Calculus: What's the Right Order?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CuriousBanker
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the appropriate order for learning calculus, specifically addressing the use of Spivak's book and foundational concepts like integers and integrals. Participants emphasize the necessity of understanding basic mathematical principles before tackling advanced texts. A recommendation is made to study "Basic Mathematics" by Lang for foundational knowledge, while "Calculus Early Transcendentals" by Stewart is suggested as a more accessible calculus resource. The consensus is that beginners should solidify their understanding of basic concepts before progressing to Spivak.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mathematical concepts, including integers and their properties.
  • Familiarity with Riemann sums and their application in calculating areas under curves.
  • Knowledge of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and its significance.
  • Basic proof techniques and logical reasoning skills.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Basic Mathematics" by Lang to build foundational skills.
  • Learn about Riemann sums and their role in calculus.
  • Explore the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in detail.
  • Review "Calculus Early Transcendentals" by Stewart for a more approachable calculus introduction.
USEFUL FOR

Students beginning their calculus journey, educators seeking effective teaching resources, and anyone looking to strengthen their mathematical foundation before advancing to higher-level calculus concepts.

CuriousBanker
Messages
190
Reaction score
24
I bought Spivaks book on calculus, and also "how to prove it". I am just doing this for fun, not for school.

On an old thread I remember reading I should learn to do proofs first before moving on to Spivak. I won't be doing this for a few months because I am busy studying for CFA exam, but I just flipped through how to prove it, and on page 2 it starts talking about intergers. I don't know what an interger is (Well I know its the area under a curve but that's about it). Should I read Spivak first?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean "integral" (as in area under a curve) or "integer" (as in 0,1,-1,2,-2,...)?
 
Kinda worries me if you're moving on to calculus without knowing what an integer is :p.
 
If you don't know what an integer is, then I think that Spivak will be a bit too difficult for you.

Why don't you first get a good book like "basic mathematics" by Lang and work through that?
 
I meant integral not interger. Whoops
 
CuriousBanker said:
I meant integral not interger. Whoops

An integral is a limit of Riemann sums. A Riemann sum is a height x width. Let's say you want to find the area under x^2 from 0 to 2.. A very crude estimate would be 4x2 (a single box). If you do two boxes, width 1, you get 1x1+4x1=5. A better estimate. Then 3, 4, 5, and so on. An INTEGRAL is where you take the limit as the number of boxes approaches infinity.

You get a cool theorem called the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus that helps you evaluate them.
 
I bought the Spivak book just before I started Calculus I so that I could 'prepare'. Huge mistake. I understood very little and to be quite honest, it made me fear what was about to come. I'm now taking Calc III and still won't go back to Spivak because of my earlier experiences with it.

If you're just starting then I think it may be a bit too difficult to use as a learning tool. I'm using a book called Calculus Early Transcendentals (Stewart) and it's quite good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
1K