Learning Topology for Physicists: A Realistic Timeframe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter muppet
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and strategies of self-studying topology, particularly using Munkres' textbook. Participants share their experiences, concerns about time management, and the relevance of topology to their broader mathematical and physics studies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to master topology to better understand differential geometry and gauge theory, while also acknowledging the challenge of balancing this with PhD research priorities.
  • Another participant reassures that taking time with exercises is normal, referencing the extensive duration of Munkres' course.
  • A self-learner mentions that some problems in set theory can take a week or longer to solve, highlighting the difficulty of finding solutions online.
  • Some participants suggest looking for similar exercises to aid understanding and emphasize the importance of attempting problems independently before seeking help.
  • One participant shares their intensive study experience, completing topology exercises in a short period, which they felt was effective for their learning.
  • A later reply connects the study of Munkres' topology to preparation for studying John M. Lee's books on smooth manifolds, indicating a shared interest in the subject matter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the challenges of self-studying topology and the importance of exercises, but there are varying opinions on the best approaches to learning and the time required to master the material. No consensus on a realistic timeframe for mastering topology is reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants express concerns about time management due to other commitments, and there are mentions of varying study habits and paces, which may affect their learning outcomes. The discussion reflects a range of experiences with self-study and the complexity of the material.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for self-learners in mathematics and physics, particularly those interested in topology and its applications in differential geometry and gauge theory.

muppet
Messages
602
Reaction score
0
I've decided that I seriously need to get some topology under my belt, and I've started to tackle the book by Munkres systematically. I only really hope to cover chapters 1-4 and 9 (executive summary for those not famililar with the book: foundational math/ set theory, topological spaces and continuous maps, connectedness and compactness, countability and separation axioms, and a brief intro to algebraic topology- path homotopies, the fundamental group and covering spaces).

I'm trying to work my way through all the corresponding exercises- something I never did enough of as an undergraduate, and I think particularly necessary as I'm studying alone. I'm slightly concerned however that material that looks like it should be easy is taking me a while; the exercises at the end of section 3 have taken me pretty much the whole afternoon. Can anyone suggest a realistic timeframe for me to attempt to master this material? I both hold unrealistic expectations of how long something will take me and dawdle/lose focus/ daydream in equal measure, so I'm really uncertain as to how quickly I should be able to progress through the text.

I'm particularly concerned about the timescale as I'm a theoretical physics PhD student in the UK. This means that a) I only have 3 and a half years to produce a thesis and any study I undertake, so my research should really take priority, and b)my real motivation is not to study topology for its own sake, but to be able to systematically tackle the mathematical literature on differential geometry- in particular, the books by John M Lee on smooth and Riemannian manifolds, and the text by Sharpe with a view to getting a good grasp on gauge theory. (I'd also like to know a hell of a lot more about physics than I presently do :rolleyes:).

As an aside, I do however appreciate that topology can be more directly useful as well, so I'd like to get a reasonable grasp of it as a subject rather than just be able to quote metrisation theorems etc. So any suggestions as to other topics in topology (general or algebraic) that are useful (or even just particularly interesting!) would also be gratefully received.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if you find that reading and doing the exercises are taking you too much time (btw, if I recall correctly this textbook is composed of a lecture series of Munkres which took him two semesters, so don't worry if it takes you too much time) to do, there are always solutions which are spreaded in the web (it's not pedagogically sound, but learning fast such a material isn't sound as well, but you have other priorities).
 
Hello,

I'm a Math self-learner and some Set Theory problems take a whole week if not longer as I can only devote like 5 hours a week.

I don't rely on the web because I want to learn by my own. Another point, it's really hard to find solutions for many problems on the web.

I'm going through Set Theory and Logic by Robert Stoll ...

:)
 
Obviously it's not easy to find solutions to every exercise there is, so you also look for similar exercises and try to make a connection between you exercise and of the solution (that's part of learning math btw).

Sometime because in some subject there's so much literature (as in set theory), if you keep searching you might find something similar to your problem.

But don't forget to do it after you tried your best.
 
Thanx mate,


I do look at other exercises as you said and it really helps.

It has been like 3 years since I started studying Set Theory, of course three years because I have a Job and barely can devote some time for it. I guess the discontinued learning hours are my biggest problem as I have to recall where I was last time I worked on this problem or that.

Currently working on the Axiom of Choice... Woooo, it makes my brain much like scrambled eggs :P
 
Last summer, I also self-studied topology from Munkres. Instead of doing every exercise, which seems excessive, I followed the syllabus and homework assignments at this page:

http://people.math.gatech.edu/~etnyre/class/4431Fall09/index.html

It took me about 2 weeks doing it for about 12 hours per day to go though all of the homework, doing all of the problems. So, quite a significant investment of time, but I feel like cramming it in all day every day helped me learn it much faster. It worked out pretty well, since I was able to skip undergraduate topology and enroll in the graduate level course during the fall.
 
It looks like I can't edit anymore, but I didn't notice that you mentioned in your post that you wanted to study Lee's books on smooth manifolds. That is precisely the textbook I used in the class I took after studying from Munkres, so this program seemed like good preparation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K