Let [tex]\left\{x_{n}\right\}[/tex] be a nonempty sequence of monotonically increasing rational numbers bounded from above. Prove that [tex]\left\{x_{n}\right\}[/tex] has a least upper bound in [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If we choose a monotonically decreasing sequence of upper bounds [tex]\left\{b_{n}\right\}[/tex] with the property that [tex]2^{n-1}\left(b_{n}-x_{n}\right)=b_{1}-x_{1}[/tex], can we show that there exists an accumulation point and conclude that it is the least upper bound? Given the choice of [tex]\left\{b_{n}\right\}[/tex], we can say that [tex]\left(x_{n+1},b_{n+1}\right)\subset\left(x_{n},b_{n}\right)[/tex], but how do we show from here that there is a least upper bound?

Thank you.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Least Upper Bound Property

Loading...

Similar Threads - Least Upper Bound | Date |
---|---|

B Doubt regarding least upper bound? | Mar 2, 2016 |

About definition of 'Bounded above' and 'Least Upper Bound Property' | Mar 16, 2012 |

About least upper bound and ordered set | Mar 13, 2012 |

Greatest lower bound/least upper bound in Q | Nov 11, 2011 |

Least upper bound axiom | Jan 5, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**