I Left Invariant Metric: What I Don't Understand

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Invariant Metric
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,098
Reaction score
1,385
I haven't learned about Lie Groups yet, but came across this question.

1626811932297.png


What I don't understand:
- is the semi-direct product ##R_+ \ltimes R^4## here a matrix group with elements ##\begin{pmatrix} \lambda & x^{\mu} \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}##? And is the group multiplication then matrix multiplication?
- I guessed that because ##R_+ \ltimes R^4 \sim R^5## that the metric acts on matrices ##g_1, g_2## in the group as it would acting on two vectors in ##R^5##, but what does it mean that the metric is left invariant? Is it that for an arbitrary matrix ##g_3## in the group that ##\langle g_1, g_2 \rangle = \langle g_3 g_1, g_3 g_2 \rangle##?

(Not sure if any of that's right and maybe it'd be better to actually learn the theory first, but sometimes a practical example can't hurt?)
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
At first glance, I think this is the subgroup of the Poincaré group with all 4 translations, but only one dilatation (multiplication with ##M_{\mu\nu}=\lambda ##) as opposed to the entire Lorentz group. You could basically do all the things you do with the Poincaré group, but with far fewer multiplications, since the entire Lorentz subgroup is reduced to ##\mathbb{R}_+.##
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top