##\left|L(f_{n}, P) - L(f,P)\right| < \epsilon##

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euklidian-Space
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Epsilon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that if a sequence of functions \( f_n \) converges uniformly to a function \( f \) on the interval \([a,b]\), and each \( f_n \) is integrable, then for any given \( \epsilon > 0 \), there exists a partition \( P \) and a natural number \( N \) such that the difference between the lower sums \( L(f_n, P) \) and \( L(f, P) \) is less than \( \epsilon \). The participants clarify that \( L(f, P) \) represents the lower sum in the Riemann integral context. They suggest using the triangle inequality to establish bounds on the sums involved, particularly focusing on the infimum values \( m_k \) and \( m_k' \) of the functions over the partition intervals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of uniform convergence of functions
  • Knowledge of Riemann and Lebesgue integrals
  • Familiarity with lower sums in integration
  • Proficiency in applying the triangle inequality in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of uniform convergence and its implications on integrals
  • Learn about the Riemann integral and its lower sums in detail
  • Explore the triangle inequality and its applications in analysis
  • Investigate the relationship between infimum values and uniform convergence
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of convergence and integration concepts.

Euklidian-Space
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that ##f_{n} \rightarrow f## uniformly on [a,b] and that each ##f_{n}## is integrable on [a,b]. Show that given ##\epsilon > 0##, there exists a partition ##P## and a natural number ##N## such that ##\left|L(f_{n}, P) - L(f,P)\right| < \epsilon##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I let P be a partition. And
$$m_{k} = inf\{f(x) : x \in [x_{k-1},x_{k}\}$$
$$m_{k}^{'} = inf\{f_{n}(x): x \in [x_{k-1}, x_{k}]\}$$
I am thinking maybe I can say ##|m_{k} - m_{k}^{'}| \leq \frac{\epsilon}{b - a}##, but i do not really know how to justify it. formally anyway


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Euklidian-Space said:

Homework Statement


Suppose that ##f_{n} \rightarrow f## uniformly on [a,b] and that each ##f_{n}## is integrable on [a,b]. Show that given ##\epsilon > 0##, there exists a partition ##P## and a natural number ##N## such that ##\left|L(f_{n}, P) - L(f,P)\right| < \epsilon##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I let P be a partition. And
$$m_{k} = inf\{f(x) : x \in [x_{k-1},x_{k}\}$$
$$m_{k}^{'} = inf\{f_{n}(x): x \in [x_{k-1}, x_{k}]\}$$
I am thinking maybe I can say ##|m_{k} - m_{k}^{'}| \leq \frac{\epsilon}{b - a}##, but i do not really know how to justify it. formally anyway
Can you refresh our memory as to what L in L(f, P) represents? Is it Lebesgue integral?
 
Mark44 said:
Can you refresh our memory as to what L in L(f, P) represents? Is it Lebesgue integral?
oh my bad. L(f,p) is the lower sum of the Reimann integral

$$L(f,P) = \sum_{k = 1}^{n} m_{k} (x_{k} - x_{k - 1})$$
 
Just a thought, use the triangle inequality, and say the sum is ##< \frac{\varepsilon}{2} + \frac{\varepsilon}{2}## using the information given.
 
Last edited:
Zondrina said:
Just a thought, use the triangle inequality, and say the sum is ##< \frac{\varepsilon}{2} + \frac{\varepsilon}{2}## using the information given.
what exactly is less than ##\epsilon/2##? I was thinking something like...

$$|L(f_{n},P) - L(f,p)| = |\sum_{k = 1}^{n} m_{k}^{'}(x_{k} - x_{k - 1}) - \sum_{k = 1}^{n} m_{k} (x_{k} - x_{k - 1}|$$

we then have
$$\sum_{k = 1}^{n} m_{k}^{'} - m_{k} (x_{k} - x_{k - 1})$$

now if i can bound ##|m_{k}^{'} - m_{k}## by epsilon some how then i think that would work?
 
If you can guarantee that ##|f_n(x) - f(x)|<\varepsilon## for all ##x##, does this imply some bound on ##|m_k - m_k'|##?
 
micromass said:
If you can guarantee that ##|f_n(x) - f(x)|<\varepsilon## for all ##x##, does this imply some bound on ##|m_k - m_k'|##?

well since ##m_{k}## and ##m_{k}^{'}## are the infs they are definitely bounded by ##\epsilon## if ##|f_n(x) - f(x)|<\varepsilon## for all ##x##; which is true because we have uniform convergence
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K