Count Iblis
- 1,859
- 8
Last edited by a moderator:
The discussion revolves around the legal precedents concerning the inheritance of a deceased's property by a potential spouse, particularly focusing on the implications of marriage consent and posthumous marriages. The scope includes legal interpretations, hypothetical scenarios, and personal opinions on the matter.
Participants express differing views on the legality and implications of posthumous marriages and the necessity of mutual consent, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a consensus.
The discussion highlights uncertainties regarding the legal framework surrounding inheritance and marriage laws, particularly in unusual circumstances such as posthumous marriages and pre-death stipulations.
jimmysnyder said:I got the legal in California answer wrong even though I got the joke. I don't agree that something which is impossible is illegal. For something to be illegal, there has to be a law against it. I doubt that such a law exists.
That's irrelevant and immaterial - Ham Burger.DaveC426913 said:11/11 Gee, me and two other people got this.
It would be illegal for her to be a widow if you were still alive.
jimmysnyder said:That's irrelevant and immaterial - Ham Burger.
davee123 said:I think generally you have to establish that both parties are mutually consenting in order to marry, and you can't establish the consent of a dead person. Although, hmmm... it strikes me as not impossible that they might perform posthumous marriages for things like soldiers who died in battle. So... maybe?
DaveE
regor60 said:Could have made this stipulation before his demise ? Think it would hold up ?