Temporary marriage, it's about time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of temporary marriage licenses proposed by lawmakers in Mexico City. Participants explore the implications of such a system, questioning the traditional notion of lifelong marriage and discussing the potential benefits and drawbacks of a temporary commitment. The conversation touches on personal experiences, societal norms, and the emotional and practical aspects of marriage.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express enthusiasm for temporary marriage, suggesting it could reduce the stress of divorce and allow couples to opt out if they are unhappy.
  • Others argue that temporary marriage makes sense only if permanent marriage is banned, questioning the realism of entering a marriage with the expectation of divorce.
  • A few participants propose that a trial period before marriage could help couples understand each other better and reduce the likelihood of divorce.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for increased divorce rates due to the option of temporary marriage, with some suggesting it could lead to a more casual approach to relationships.
  • Several participants share personal anecdotes about their own relationships and family histories, reflecting on the varying lengths of engagement and marriage.
  • Some participants question the societal benefits associated with marriage, suggesting that if marriage is seen as temporary, it undermines the traditional values associated with it.
  • There is mention of studies regarding cohabitation and divorce rates, with mixed interpretations of their implications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the merits or drawbacks of temporary marriage. There are multiple competing views, with some supporting the idea while others express skepticism or concern about its implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference personal experiences and societal norms, indicating that their views are influenced by individual circumstances and cultural backgrounds. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of marriage and the expectations surrounding it, which may not be universally applicable.

  • #61
How would this apply if the couple have children and then get a divorce? If the mtoher doesn't work, how much could she get from the husband?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
article said:
The Church holds considerable sway in the country with the world's second largest Catholic population after Brazil.

I would have thought it would be tough to get traction for such an idea in a country that is so heavily Catholic.
 
  • #63
turbo said:
I would have thought it would be tough to get traction for such an idea in a country that is so heavily Catholic.
That was my first thought. Of course the Catholic church is against it.
 
  • #64
I could see it work for students. You can marry your college sweetheart and by the time the marriage ends no one is going to call you a fornicator (not that people use this word often in the western world)
 
  • #65
Ryan_m_b said:
Not to mention it's an extremely effective way of deciding who owns a woman.

The correct answer is "no one. Ever."