A Lehmann Kallen and spectral representation

  • Thread starter Thread starter paralleltransport
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Representation
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of the spectral density function in quantum field theory, particularly its physical significance. It is noted that the propagator's real poles correspond to stable particles, suggesting that the spectral function contains delta functions representing one-particle states at rest. However, in a Lorentz invariant framework, these states can be boosted to yield a continuous spectrum, indicating that the spectral function is not the complete spectrum of the theory but is related to it. The Lehmann spectral density is highlighted as being connected to the probability of transitions from one-particle states to multi-particle states. Understanding this relationship is crucial for interpreting the physical implications of the spectral function in quantum field theory.
paralleltransport
Messages
128
Reaction score
97
TL;DR
I'd like to better understand the lehmann kallen representation of the propagator.
Hello,

My question pertains to the formula below:
1644723952025.png


In particular, I would like to ask about the spectral density function shown below:
1644724002731.png
What does the spectral function physically represent? Is there any interpretation of its meaning, whether it has a relation to the physical spectrum of the theory.

My work:

The propagator real poles correspond to particles (a particle is a lump of energy that doesn't decay or split), it seems to suggest that the spectral function would have delta functions at 1 particle state at rest. Obviously, in a lorentz invariant QFT, one can boost this one particle state to get a continuous spectrum, so \rho(p^2) is not the spectrum of the theory, but it has some relation to it.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Theoretical physicist C.N. Yang died at the age of 103 years on October 18, 2025. He is the Yang in Yang-Mills theory, which he and his collaborators devised in 1953, which is a generic quantum field theory that is used by scientists to study amplitudes (i.e. vector probabilities) that are foundational in all Standard Model processes and most quantum gravity theories. He also won a Nobel prize in 1957 for his work on CP violation. (I didn't see the post in General Discussions at PF on his...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K