With the method of substitution with integrals, Leibniz's notation comes in handy has it shows us usefull transformation with simple manipulation. However, I'm asking myself what is the proof behind all that? For substituion, wouldn't have to use the definition of integral and use limits?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Leibniz's notation and how suggestive it is

Loading...

Similar Threads for Leibniz's notation suggestive | Date |
---|---|

Leibniz Notation | Dec 14, 2015 |

Leibniz notation | Nov 11, 2013 |

Leibniz notation when taking derivatives! | Sep 15, 2012 |

Leibniz notation | Apr 21, 2011 |

Leibniz notation makes no sense? | Feb 18, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**