Length of ruler in expanding Universe

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of an expanding universe on the proper length of a ruler made of atoms. It establishes that while the scale factor a increases, the proper length ds of a non-expanding ruler remains equal to its comoving length dx. The Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric, which assumes homogeneity and isotropy, is only applicable in regions devoid of significant mass concentrations, such as galaxies. The conversation also highlights the concept of cosmological time dilation, where time intervals for an astronaut using a rigid ruler would appear to shorten as the universe expands.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric
  • Familiarity with cosmological principles such as homogeneity and isotropy
  • Knowledge of proper length and comoving length in cosmology
  • Basic grasp of time dilation effects in special and general relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric in cosmology
  • Study the concept of cosmological time dilation and its effects on measurements
  • Examine the relationship between proper length and comoving length in expanding universes
  • Explore the role of energy density and pressure in cosmic expansion
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, astrophysicists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the dynamics of the expanding universe and the implications for measurements of distance and time.

  • #31
johne1618 said:
Actually I still have a query about all this. Here is another way of putting my argument.

Light travels on a null geodesic, ds=0, so that its path obeys the relationship
<br /> a \ dx = dt<br />
So at the present time with a=1 light travels 1 light-second in 1 second of cosmological time.

But at a future time with a=2 light travels 2 light-seconds in 1 second of cosmological time.

If a future observer is going to measure a constant speed of light then his time scale must change so that light travels the 2 light-seconds in 2 of his seconds.

Therefore the future observer's clock must run twice as fast as our present clock (which by definition runs on cosmological time).

Actually I now accept my argument is wrong after all for the reason that Chalnoth pointed out!

The null geodesic for light gives
<br /> a(t) \ dx = c \ dt<br />
where I am retaining c for clarity.

dx is an interval of comoving distance and dt is an interval of cosmological time.

Now an interval of proper distance ds at any time t is given by
<br /> ds=a(t) \ dx.<br />
Therefore the above geodesic can be written simply as
<br /> ds = c \ dt<br />
which is true for any cosmological time t.

Thus light travels at a constant velocity c for all observers who simply use cosmological time.

To illustrate the situation as I now see it:

For a=1
<br /> dx = c \ dt \\<br /> ds = dx = c \ dt<br />
For a=2
<br /> 2 \ dx = c \ dt \\<br /> dx = c \ dt / 2 \\<br /> ds = 2 \ dx = 2 \cdot (c \ dt / 2) = c \ dt<br />
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K