johne1618
- 368
- 0
johne1618 said:Actually I still have a query about all this. Here is another way of putting my argument.
Light travels on a null geodesic, ds=0, so that its path obeys the relationship
[tex] a \ dx = dt[/tex]
So at the present time with [itex]a=1[/itex] light travels 1 light-second in 1 second of cosmological time.
But at a future time with [itex]a=2[/itex] light travels 2 light-seconds in 1 second of cosmological time.
If a future observer is going to measure a constant speed of light then his time scale must change so that light travels the 2 light-seconds in 2 of his seconds.
Therefore the future observer's clock must run twice as fast as our present clock (which by definition runs on cosmological time).
Actually I now accept my argument is wrong after all for the reason that Chalnoth pointed out!
The null geodesic for light gives
[tex] a(t) \ dx = c \ dt[/tex]
where I am retaining [itex]c[/itex] for clarity.
[itex]dx[/itex] is an interval of comoving distance and [itex]dt[/itex] is an interval of cosmological time.
Now an interval of proper distance [itex]ds[/itex] at any time [itex]t[/itex] is given by
[tex] ds=a(t) \ dx.[/tex]
Therefore the above geodesic can be written simply as
[tex] ds = c \ dt[/tex]
which is true for any cosmological time [itex]t[/itex].
Thus light travels at a constant velocity [itex]c[/itex] for all observers who simply use cosmological time.
To illustrate the situation as I now see it:
For [itex]a=1[/itex]
[tex] dx = c \ dt \\<br /> ds = dx = c \ dt[/tex]
For [itex]a=2[/itex]
[tex] 2 \ dx = c \ dt \\<br /> dx = c \ dt / 2 \\<br /> ds = 2 \ dx = 2 \cdot (c \ dt / 2) = c \ dt[/tex]
Last edited: