Lennard-Jones potential for 3 atoms

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Lennard-Jones potential to a three-atom lattice configuration, specifically analyzing the acceleration of the middle atom, ##x_2##, which interacts with stationary atoms ##x_1## and ##x_3##. The total acceleration for ##x_2## is correctly derived as: a_2 = 24(2r_{21}^{-13} - r_{21}^{-7}) + 24(-2r_{32}^{-13} + r_{32}^{-7}), where ##r_{21} = |x_2 - x_1|## and ##r_{32} = |x_3 - x_2|##. The potential is defined as V_\mathrm{LJ}(r) = 4 \epsilon \left[ \left( \frac{\sigma}{r} \right)^{12} - \left( \frac{\sigma}{r} \right)^{6} \right], confirming the correct formulation of the Lennard-Jones potential in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Lennard-Jones potential
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics, specifically Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, particularly gradient operations
  • Basic concepts of atomic interactions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Lennard-Jones potential in multi-atom systems
  • Explore numerical methods for simulating atomic interactions using the Lennard-Jones potential
  • Learn about force calculations in molecular dynamics simulations
  • Investigate the effects of varying parameters (m, σ, ε) on atomic behavior in simulations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, chemists, and computational scientists involved in molecular dynamics simulations and atomic interaction modeling will benefit from this discussion.

barnflakes
Messages
156
Reaction score
4
If I have a 3 atom lattice laid out at positions ##x_1 = 1, x_2 = 2, x_3 = 3##

##x_1## and ##x_3## are stationary, but ##x_2## interacts with ##x_1## and ##x_3## via the Lennard-Jones interatomic potential.

I therefore worked out that the total acceleration for ##x_2## for ##m = \sigma = \epsilon = 1## is:a_2 = 24(2r_{21}^{-13} - r_{21}^{-7}) + 24(-2r_{32}^{-13} + r_{32}^{-7});

where ##r_{21} = |x_2 - x_1| , r_{32} = |x_3 - x_2|##

Is this correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, I assume that the in this particular case the Lennard-Jones potential is written as
$$
V_\mathrm{LJ}(r) = 4 \epsilon \left[ \left( \frac{\sigma}{r} \right)^{12} - \left( \frac{\sigma}{r} \right)^{6}
\right]
$$

barnflakes said:
Is this correct?
Yes, since
$$
a = \frac{F}{m} = \frac{1}{m} (- \nabla V)
$$

It is always good to make a sanity check. If ##r_{21} \rightarrow 0##, then atoms 1 and 2 are getting very close and the repulsive force dominates, so that should lead to an positive acceleration (i.e., to the right), and conversely for ##r_{32} \rightarrow 0##. The sign does appear to be correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K