Let's talk about geometrized units

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter elegysix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
elegysix
Messages
404
Reaction score
15
Is there a reason geometrized units convert everything to length?
Why not time or something else?
This seems odd to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's only three dimensions available for units: length, time, and mass.
You have to pick one so why not length?

It's usually more convenient to convert lengths to time for discussions and time to length for maths.
It would be a bit funny to convert everything to mass (energy) but I suppose you could.
 
elegysix said:
Is there a reason geometrized units convert everything to length?
Why not time or something else?
This seems odd to me.
The reason to choose length is in the name: geometrized. The idea comes from relativity, which in its mathematically cleanest form interprets all of the famous relativistic effects as features of the geometry of spacetime. In this geometry it makes sense to use units of length for time. Then, it is merely a matter of carrying that geometric idea through to all the other units.

In the end it is just an arbitrary convention and they could have just as well called it "temporalized" or something else and used time or some other base unit.
 
Last edited: