Lewis Bending Stress: Why Does Lewis Factor Depend on x?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Lewis bending equation for spur gear teeth, specifically focusing on the dependency of the Lewis form factor on the vertical distance x, which is measured from the triangle formed by the base t and fillet a. Participants explore the implications of this dependency and its representation in existing literature.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the Lewis form factor depends on x and expresses curiosity about the relationship between x, height h, and width t, noting that x can be expressed as x = t²/4h.
  • Another participant explains that x represents the length of the cantilever to which the tooth is simplified, referencing a source for further explanation.
  • A subsequent reply reiterates that x is a separate parameter related to the tooth, distinguishing it from h and t.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the use of x in literature, suggesting that standard derivations using only the cantilever length appear more reasonable.
  • Another participant agrees with the skepticism regarding the parameter x and its representation in the literature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the relevance and application of the parameter x in the Lewis bending equation, with some supporting its use and others questioning its validity based on existing literature.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the definitions and assumptions related to the parameters involved in the Lewis bending equation, particularly concerning the role of x and its representation in standard derivations.

dsaun777
Messages
296
Reaction score
39
How come in the lewis bending equation for spur gear tooth does the lewis form factor depend on x? x being the vertical distance measured from the triangle that is formed from the base t and fillet a. I know that you can express the height h and width t in terms of x such that x= t^2/4h, but why?

siTDzHr.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The distance ##x## is the length of the cantilever to which the tooth is simplified in this method. Good explanation and derivation is provided in "Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design".
 
FEAnalyst said:
The distance ##x## is the length of the cantilever to which the tooth is simplified in this method. Good explanation and derivation is provided in "Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design".
No, h is the length, t is the width and F is the face. X is a separate parameter that deals with the tooth.
 
dsaun777 said:
No, h is the length, t is the width and F is the face. X is a separate parameter that deals with the tooth.
Right, I didn’t look closely at the image. What is the source of this figure ? I haven’t seen this parameter being used in literature. Standard derivations with just the cantilever length seem more reasonable.
 
FEAnalyst said:
Right, I didn’t look closely at the image. What is the source of this figure ? I haven’t seen this parameter being used in literature. Standard derivations with just the cantilever length seem more reasonable.
Agreed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
24K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
4K