LHC First Results: Summary and Analysis

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Demystifier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lhc
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the first results from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), specifically focusing on the CMS experiment and the context of its publication. Participants explore the implications of these results and the peer review process involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that while the recent results are significant, they are not the very first results from the LHC, referencing earlier publications.
  • Others highlight the rapid peer review process of the CMS experiment results, questioning the implications of such a quick turnaround in publication.
  • A participant expresses surprise at the speed of publication, suggesting it indicates urgency in disseminating the findings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is some agreement on the significance of the results, but participants express differing views on the timeline and context of previous results, indicating unresolved aspects of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific publications and timelines, which may depend on definitions of "first results" and the criteria for peer review, but these assumptions remain unexamined.

Physics news on Phys.org
While this is an early result, it's not the first. That was The European Physical Journal C: Volume 65, Issue 1 (2010), Page 111
 
It's the first results from the CMS experiment. It strikes me a a little funny that it only spent 72 hours in peer review, and was published 4 days after submission. They were in a hurry!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
7K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K