Li-Ion vs LiPo… why not both?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flyboy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the comparison of Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) and Lithium-Polymer (LiPo) batteries for electric RC aircraft, particularly focusing on endurance flights and the potential for combining both battery types to optimize performance. Participants explore the advantages and limitations of each battery type in the context of high-endurance and high-power applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that LiPo batteries excel in high-power applications, while Li-Ion batteries are favored for endurance due to their better energy density.
  • Concerns are raised about the limited current output of Li-Ion batteries during takeoff, prompting the idea of paralleling a small LiPo battery to provide additional current when needed.
  • Another participant suggests that keeping weight low is crucial for endurance flight, implying that using a catapult or longer runway may be more effective than adding complexity with multiple battery types.
  • Discussion includes the idea that a single larger battery may be more efficient than multiple smaller batteries due to the additional weight of casings and the diminishing returns of exotic battery types.
  • There is a recognition that switching between battery types would require careful management of different chemistries and parameters, indicating that while feasible, it is not a trivial solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality of using both battery types in tandem, with some advocating for simpler solutions like using a catapult, while others explore the technical feasibility of a dual battery system. No consensus is reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexities involved in managing different battery chemistries, including the need for proper switching mechanisms and the implications for weight and design. There is also mention of trade-offs between recharge capacity and power density.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in electric RC aircraft design, battery technology, and endurance flight optimization may find this discussion relevant.

Flyboy
Gold Member
Messages
426
Reaction score
633
TL;DR
Can you parallel a Li-Ion and a LiPo battery?
I’m looking into electric RC aircraft, especially for endurance flights, and I keep running into a debate over what is the best battery design for a high-endurance/long range electric plane.

I have gathered that LiPo batteries are outstanding for high-power applications, such as racers, eVTOL, etc, where you need large amounts of power constantly.

On the other hand, Li-Ion batteries are increasingly used for high endurance FPV drones that are not running wide-open throttle, as the lower current output of the batteries is less of an issue, and the better energy density is advantageous.

I would love to use Li-Ion batteries for a future design where endurance and efficiency are the driving factors, but I am concerned about the limited current output, especially at takeoff. My thought was to parallel the main Li-Ion battery with a small LiPo battery that would provide the extra current needed for takeoff and climb out before switching to the Li-Ion, but I have seen no examples of this having been done before. Thus, I am wondering why it isn’t done. Obviously, there’s the issue of different cell voltages and current outputs, so directly paralleling them is probably not safe, but given the current state of solid state relays, it would seem to be a relatively simple task to make them separate circuits that would switch between them after you reach a safe cruising state.

I am not an electrical expert by any stretch of the imagination, so what am I missing aside from the additional weight and complexity?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Endurance flight is about keeping weight as low as possible, so it is probably much wiser to use longer runway (or start from a catapult, even DIY style) than to make model heavier.

1712007272045.png
 
I would come at it from another direction. You want a high power/weight ratio. You can do that by either getting the power up, or the weight down. A battery's power depends on its volume, but a battery also has a casing: a non-power producing region that scales as the area. But still adds weight. So one big battery is, all other things being equal, better than two smaller ones.

Exotic batteries, like Lithium-Polymer or Lithium-Metal-Phosphate do a little better than Lithium-Ion, but not hugely better. Enough better to justify the additional dead weight? I don't know, but probably not.

If you have someone who is willing to build a batter for you, I'd look into making the battery casing some other part of the aircraft, so it does double duty. Also, there is a trade-off between recharge capacity and power density. If you only wanted to charge it, say, 30 times, you could do better than one you want to change 500 times. Maybe.
 
Flyboy said:
...to parallel the main Li-Ion battery with a small LiPo battery that would provide the extra current needed for takeoff and climb out before switching to the Li-Ion
If it's to 'switch to', then it's a bit more complicated parallel then a simple 'parallel battery'. And given the different chemistry/parameters, some kind of switching/matching would be clearly required.

Doable, but not trivial. I too would rather recommend a catapult or such as @Borek already suggested.

Maybe you could take a look at (proper) military drones.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K