Lie Bracket for Group Elements of SU(3)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the Lie bracket for two elements of SU(3), utilizing the equation [X,Y] = JXY - JYX, where J represents the Jacobian matrices. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding the Lie algebra su(3) and its operations, particularly in the context of vector fields and tangent spaces. A key point raised is the distinction between the commutator of vector fields and their representation in tangent spaces, which is crucial for correctly applying the Lie bracket operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SU(3) and its Lie algebra su(3)
  • Familiarity with Jacobian matrices and their applications
  • Knowledge of vector fields and tangent spaces in differential geometry
  • Basic concepts of Lie groups and Lie brackets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of SU(3) and its representation theory
  • Learn about Jacobian matrices and their role in transformations
  • Explore the relationship between vector fields and Lie brackets
  • Investigate the applications of Lie algebra in physics, particularly in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying group theory, particularly those interested in the applications of Lie algebras in theoretical physics and geometry.

nigelscott
Messages
133
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Determine the Lie bracket for 2 elements of SU(3).

Homework Equations


[X,Y] = JXY - JYX where J are the Jacobean matrices

The Attempt at a Solution


I exponentiated λ1 and λ2 to get X and Y which are 3 x 3 matrices.. If the group elements are interpreted as vector fields then I ought to be able to apply the above equation to get Z (i..e. exp(iθλ3). The problem is I don't know how to formulate the Jacobean matrices. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nigelscott said:
Determine the Lie bracket for 2 elements of SU(3).
SU(3) or su(3) (its Lie algebra)? The Lie bracket is an operation on the Lie algebra. Given general form of a rotation operator you should be able to find its composition with another and from there the commutator for small rotations.
 
I think I may be confusing myself. I think what you are saying is that although the commutator of 2 vector fields results in a third vector field on the manifold, that field at a given point is, by definition, assigned to a tangent space (as are the original fields). In this sense trying to figure out the commutator in terms of vectors fields on the manifold is not really the correct way to look at things or is a valid thing to do. All of the mathematics takes place in the tangent space. Am I getting close? I am new to this subject. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K