Life of batteries (Probability)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the lifetime of batteries modeled as independent random variables with an exponential distribution. The problem specifically focuses on determining the cumulative distribution function (CDF) and probability density function (PDF) of the minimum lifetime of two batteries used in a flashlight.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the minimum of two random variables and their respective distributions. There are attempts to apply order statistics and questions about the correct use of CDF and PDF in this context. Some participants express uncertainty about the initial approach and the implications of using the Dirac delta function.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of various methods to derive the PDF of the minimum lifetime. Some participants have shared their attempts and results, while others are seeking clarification on specific steps and concepts. Multiple interpretations and approaches are being discussed, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to clarify the definitions and relationships between the CDF and PDF of the random variables involved, as well as the implications of using order statistics in their calculations.

ja404
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The lifetime of batteries are independent random variables Xi, i= 1,2,... each having exponential distribution given by the density f(x) = 2e^-2x, x>0, 0 elsewhere.
If a flashlight needs two batteries to work, then the time that the flashlight can operate is a random variable Y=min(X1,X2). Find the CDF and PDF of Y


Homework Equations


Xi, i= 1,2,...
Xi ~ f(x) = 2e^-2x, x>0, 0 elsewhere
Y=min(X1,X2)

The Attempt at a Solution


What I'm not sure about is the initial approach to this problem. I'm not sure if I should treat it as an order statistics problem in which case i'd be trying to use the equation:

g(y) = n((1-Fx(y))^(n-1))f(y)

though I'm not sure if Fx(y) and f(y) are just the respective cdf and pdf of X.
I know if i have the pdf, I can get the cdf easily.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what a Dirac delta function is? Given a PDF f(x1,x2) for two variables x1 and x2, the PDF g(y) for any function y=h(x1,x2) of these is given by
g(y) = \int dx_1\,dx_2\,f(x_1,x_2)\delta(y-h(x_1,x_2))
where \delta(y) is the Dirac delta function, and where x1 and x2 are integrated over their complete ranges (whatever they are).
 
Thanks for the help. I don't recall covering the dirac delta at all but I'm trying to use it and we'll see how it works. I was thinking there might be a transform involved as well? Thanks again, I appreciate it.
 
I was able to use this method to solve the problem, but it's tricky. There's probably (no pun intended) a method that avoids it; maybe someone else can help.
 
Since Y is min(X1, X2), and if Prob{Xi < x) = F(x), what is the probability Prob{min(X1,X2) < y), in terms of the F function?
 
I just can't figure out how to deal with that "min". I know that if say Y=X1^2 then I would just follow:

cdf = Fy(y) = P(Y<y) = P(X^2<y) = P(X<Y^1/2) etc, but I don't know how to represent that 'minimum' when I'm trying to solve the inequality for X.

Thanks again.
 
If the minimum of X1 and X2 is less than y, then it cannot be the case that "both X1 > y and X2 > y."
 
Would it correct to say then P(Y1>y) = P(X1>Y)*P(X2>Y) ?
Thanks.
 
Exactly, or P(Y<y) = 1 - (1-P(X1<Y))*(1-P(X2<Y)).
 
  • #10
Ok, I'm coming up with a pdf of:

(4e^-2y)*(1+e^-2y)

OR

(4e^-2y)+(4e^-4y)

Thoughts?
 
  • #11
Not what I got. And I got the same answer with my fancy delta-function method and EmulaFish's simpler method.

Can you show your work?
 
  • #12
well after talking to my professor, he said I should be using the order statistic technique

pdf of Y=min(X1,X2...Xn) = g(y) = n*[(1-Fx(y))^n-1]*fx(y)

where n=2 for this case
Fx(y) is cdf of X evaluated at y = -e^-2y
fx(y) is pdf of X evaluated at y = 2e^-2y

I put those into g(y) and that's how I came up with that.
Thanks again.
 
  • #13
Any ideas on what I might be doing wrong? Thanks.
 
  • #14
I figured out one thing I've been doing wrong. My new answer for pdf of Y=min(X1,X2) is

4e^-4y

I'm pretty confident about that one.
 
  • #15
That's what I got!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K