Limit does not exist but function exist

  • Thread starter Thread starter funlord
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Limit
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 4K views
funlord
Messages
15
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


there are four cases on limits given to us, and one of them I didnt really understand.
This case was: Limit f(x) as x approaches a does not exist but f(a) exist.

Homework Equations


upload_2015-6-20_8-32-29.png

The Attempt at a Solution


My answer here that the limit in this piecewise defined function exist,
As x approaches -5 from the left, it uses the function x+3;
And as x approaches -5 from the right, it uses the function √(25-x^2)please give me a great explanation with this case

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
funlord said:

Homework Statement


there are four cases on limits given to us, and one of them I didnt really understand.
This case was: Limit f(x) as x approaches a does not exist but f(a) exist.

Homework Equations


View attachment 85012

The Attempt at a Solution


My answer here that the limit in this piecewise defined function exist,
As x approaches -5 from the left, it uses the function x+3;
And as x approaches -5 from the right, it uses the function √(25-x^2)please give me a great explanation with this case

Thank you

Do you really think that 0 = -2? That would need to be true in order that f(x) have a limit as x → -5.
 
funlord said:
As x approaches -5 from the left, it uses the function x+3;
This suggests that the limit should be -2.

funlord said:
And as x approaches -5 from the right, it uses the function √(25-x^2)
This suggests that the limit should be 0.

A limit of f at 5 is a number L such that for all ##\varepsilon>0## there's a ##\delta>0## such that the following implication holds for all real numbers ##x##.
$$0<|x-5|<\delta\ \Rightarrow\ |f(x)-L|<\varepsilon.$$ The implication is saying that f maps the interval ##(5-\delta,5+\delta)## into the interval ##(L+\varepsilon,L-\varepsilon)##.

Now let's see if there a ##\delta>0## with the property above, in the special case when ##\varepsilon=1##. No matter how small we choose ##\delta##, there's an x in the interval ##(5-\delta,5+\delta)## such that f(x) is not in the interval (-2-1,-2+1)=(-3,-1). (Choose x slightly greater than 5, so that f(x) is very close to 0). This implies that -2 can't be a limit. And there's also a y in the interval ##(5-\delta,5+\delta)## such that f(y) is not in the interval (0-1,0+1)=(-1,1). (Choose y slightly less than 5, so that f(y) is very slose to -2). This implies that 0 can't be a limit.
 
Last edited:
funlord said:

Homework Statement


there are four cases on limits given to us, and one of them I didnt really understand.
This case was: Limit f(x) as x approaches a does not exist but f(a) exist.

Homework Equations


View attachment 85012

The Attempt at a Solution


My answer here that the limit in this piecewise defined function exist,
As x approaches -5 from the left, it uses the function x+3;
Yes, and so as x gets closer and closer to -5 (from the left), f(x) gets closer and closer to -5+ 3= -2.

And as x approaches -5 from the right, it uses the function √(25-x^2)
Yes, and so as x gets closer and closer to -5 (from the right), f(x) gets closer and closer to √(25-(-5)^2)= 0.
But we can't say that f(x) gets closer and closer to anyone number as x gets closer and closer to -5.

please give me a great explanation with this case

Thank you
 
thank you for the great explanation
 
There is a typo on that page the image is taken from:

upload_2015-6-23_12-0-36.png


It seems this should have said:

##\displaystyle\ \lim_{x\to -5}\, f(x) \ \text{ does not exist. [why?]} \ ##​

As it's stated in your image, the limit does exist. It's simply the same as the constant ƒ(-5) , which is zero .
 
funlord said:

Homework Statement


there are four cases on limits given to us, and one of them I didnt really understand.
This case was: Limit f(x) as x approaches a does not exist but f(a) exist.

Does the problem say "there exists an a such that..." or "for all a.."

Also, are you required to give an equation as the representation of a function? A function can be represented in 4 different ways: in words, as an equation, in a table, and as a graph. Perhaps reasoning with one of these other representations may be helpful.