Limit of Partial Sums involving Summation of a Product

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of the sequence of partial sums defined by sn = 1 + ∑i=1n (∏k=1i(1/2 + 1/k)). Participants analyze the convergence of the product k=1i(1/2 + 1/k) and its implications for the sum. The limit comparison test indicates that the product diverges, leading to confusion regarding the limit of the partial sums, with Wolfram Alpha suggesting a limit of 8. The discussion concludes that the series converges, and participants suggest using the Cauchy criterion for further analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of infinite series and convergence
  • Familiarity with products and their convergence properties
  • Knowledge of the limit comparison test
  • Experience with Cauchy sequences and criteria
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the convergence of infinite products in detail
  • Learn about the Cauchy criterion for series convergence
  • Explore the limit comparison test and its applications
  • Investigate geometric series and their convergence properties
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers interested in series convergence, particularly those dealing with infinite products and their implications in analysis.

Euler2718
Messages
90
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Show that the sequence of partial sums
s_{n} = 1+\sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(\prod_{k=1}^{i}\left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{k}\right)\right)
converges, with n\in \mathbb{N}\cup \{0\}

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So we want to find
\lim_{n\to\infty} s_{n} = \lim_{n\to\infty} \left(1+ \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(\prod_{k=1}^{i}\left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{k}\right)\right) \right) = 1 + \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \left(\prod_{k=1}^{i}\left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{k}\right) \right)

I haven't had much experience in a summation of a product, so my best guess was to determine convergence of the product first. Rewriting \prod_{k=1}^{i}\left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{k}\right) = \prod_{k=1}^{\infty}\left( 1 + \frac{2-k}{2k}\right) the problem then becomes \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{2-k}{2k} which diverges by the limit comparison test. If I recall correctly this implies the product should diverge to 0? So the infinite sum of this is just 0, and the limit of partial sums is then 1? However wolfram alpha begs to differ and it gives me the answer of 8. How should I have proceeded?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Euler2718 said:

Homework Statement


Show that the sequence of partial sums
s_{n} = 1+\sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(\prod_{k=1}^{i}\left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{k}\right)\right)
converges, with n\in \mathbb{N}\cup \{0\}

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So we want to find
\lim_{n\to\infty} s_{n} = \lim_{n\to\infty} \left(1+ \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(\prod_{k=1}^{i}\left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{k}\right)\right) \right) = 1 + \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \left(\prod_{k=1}^{i}\left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{k}\right) \right)

I haven't had much experience in a summation of a product, so my best guess was to determine convergence of the product first. Rewriting \prod_{k=1}^{i}\left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{k}\right) = \prod_{k=1}^{\infty}\left( 1 + \frac{2-k}{2k}\right) the problem then becomes \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{2-k}{2k}
Can you show your work leading up to this summation?
Euler2718 said:
which diverges by the limit comparison test. If I recall correctly this implies the product should diverge to 0?
What does "diverge to 0" mean? You could say that a product converges to some number, but you can't say that it diverges to a specific number.
Euler2718 said:
So the infinite sum of this is just 0, and the limit of partial sums is then 1? However wolfram alpha begs to differ and it gives me the answer of 8. How should I have proceeded?
I would try to expand the sum and product for a few terms to get an idea of possible simplification, or at least a general idea of the behavior.
 
How about calculating the (finite) product first?
 
Mark44 said:
Can you show your work leading up to this summation?
The original problem was to prove that \sum a_{n} converges, given that a_{n+1} = \left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{n} \right)a_{n}, with a_{1}=1. After messing around with this, I came up with the formula in my original post.
Mark44 said:
What does "diverge to 0" mean? You could say that a product converges to some number, but you can't say that it diverges to a specific number.
Sorry, I was referring to jargon used here
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/778202/convergence-of-infinite-product-prod-n-2-infty-1-frac-1n

Would probably be better to stick to 'converges'.
Mark44 said:
I would try to expand the sum and product for a few terms to get an idea of possible simplification, or at least a general idea of the behavior.
fresh_42 said:
How about calculating the (finite) product first?
Alright, I will attempt this.
 
Euler2718 said:
The original problem was to prove that \sum a_{n} converges, given that a_{n+1} = \left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{n} \right)a_{n}, with a_{1}=1. After messing around with this, I came up with the formula in my original post.
After working with this formula for a few terms in the sequence, I think I have come up with a formula for ##a_{n + 1}## in terms of ##a_0##.
 
Expanding the partial product, I found that p_{n} = \left(\frac{1}{2} + 1\right)\cdot\left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}\right) \dots \cdot \frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{2^{n-1}}. Fortunately this goes to 0 in the limit.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
Euler2718 said:
Expanding the partial product, I found that p_{n} = \left(\frac{1}{2} + 1\right)\cdot\left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}\right) \dots \cdot \frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{2^{n-1}}. Fortunately this goes to 0 in the limit.
Which is irrelevant in your problem.

The fact that ##\lim_{n \to \infty}a_n = 0## doesn't have any bearing on whether ##\sum_{n = 0}^\infty a_n## converges or diverges. For example, ##\sum_{n = 1}^\infty \frac 1 n## diverges, while ##\sum_{n = 1}^\infty \frac 1 {n^2}## converges. In both cases, ##\lim_{n \to \infty}a_n = 0##.
 
Mark44 said:
Which is irrelevant in your problem.
My original attack on the problem was to analyze the product first to see it it converged. I haven't been able to make a conclusion about the series yet. I know that the problem I should be looking at is, \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\left( \prod_{k=1}^{i} \left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{k} \right) \right) =\prod_{k=1}^{1} \left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{k} \right) +\prod_{k=1}^{2} \left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{k} \right) +\prod_{k=1}^{3} \left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{k} \right) + \dots . I should be looking at the partial sums of this series, correct?
 
You have calculated the product, I think. At least I found the correct term in what you've written. I just didn't know what ##p_n## should be. Now you can calculate ##|s_n-s_m|##. Does this sound familiar?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Euler2718
  • #10
fresh_42 said:
You have calculated the product, I think. At least I found the correct term in what you've written. I just didn't know what ##p_n## should be. Now you can calculate ##|s_n-s_m|##. Does this sound familiar?
If I'm reading it right, that difference is a set up for Cauchy criteria.
 
  • #11
Ah, so the problem then becomes to show for all \epsilon>0 there exists N\in\mathbb{N} such that \left| \frac{ (n+1)(n+2) }{2^{n-1}} - \frac{ (m+1)(m+2) }{2^{m-1}} \right| < \epsilon for all n,m \geq N. Once this is proved, (s_{n}) is Cauchy, so it must converge, thus the series converges.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #12
Euler2718 said:
The original problem was to prove that \sum a_{n} converges, given that a_{n+1} = \left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{n} \right)a_{n}, with a_{1}=1. After messing around with this, I came up with the formula in my original post.

Sorry, I was referring to jargon used here
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/778202/convergence-of-infinite-product-prod-n-2-infty-1-frac-1n
Would probably be better to stick to 'converges'.Alright, I will attempt this.

If all you want to do is show convergence of ##\sum a_n## then you do not need such fancy machinery; perhaps you need to do much more if you want to actually evaluate the summation. Beyond a certain finite value of ##n## the ##a_n## are bounded above by a geometric sequence ##c \alpha^n##, with ##0 < \alpha < 1##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Euler2718 and StoneTemplePython
  • #13
Ratio test?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Euler2718

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K