MHB Limit of the smallest function value

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the behavior of the function \( f_n(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{2n} x^k \) as \( n \) approaches infinity. It is established that the smallest value of this function, denoted as \( m_n \), converges to \( \frac{1}{2} \). The analysis likely involves evaluating the function's limits and properties as \( n \) increases. The convergence is significant in understanding the function's minimum behavior in relation to its parameters. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of this limit in mathematical analysis.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Let $m_n$ be the smallest value of the function:

$$f_n(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{2n}x^k.$$

Show, that $m_n\to\frac{1}{2}$ as $n \to \infty$.

Source: Nordic Math. Contest
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suggested solution:
For $n > 1$:

$$f_n(x) = 1 + x + x^2 + …$$
$$= 1+x(1 + x^2 +x^4 + …) + x^2(1 + x^2 +x^4 + ….)$$
\[= 1 + x(x+1)\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}x^{2k}\]

From this we see that $f_n(x) \geq 1$, for $x \leq −1$ and $x \geq 0$. Consequently, $f_n$ attains its minimum value in the interval $(−1, 0)$. On this interval\[f_n(x) = \frac{1-x^{2n+1}}{1-x}> \frac{1}{1-x} > \frac{1}{2}\]So $m_n \geq \frac{1}{2}$. But\[m_n \leq f_n\left ( -1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\right ) < \frac{1}{2-\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}}+\frac{\left ( 1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \right )^{2n+1}}{2-\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}}\]
As $n \rightarrow \infty$, the first term on the right hand side tends to the limit $\frac{1}{2}$.

In the second term, the factor\[\left ( 1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \right )^{2n} = \left ( \left ( 1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \right )^{\sqrt{n}} \right )^{2\sqrt{n}}\]

of the nominator tends to zero, because

\[\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty }\left ( 1-\frac{1}{k} \right )^k = e^{-1} < 1\]Thus,

\[\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty }m_n = \frac{1}{2}.\]
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K