A Limits and Supremum: Is It True?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathvsphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Supremum
Mathvsphysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
We have ##a_n## converges in norm to ##a## and a set ##S## such that for all ##n\ge 0##
$$\sup_{s\in S} <a_n,s><+\infty .$$ Is it true that ##\sup_{s\in S} <a,s><+\infty##
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to use two hashes (or two dollars) for Latex delimiters.
 
Is this a homework-type of problem? There is a format for those and you must show work before we can give hints.
Suppose ##M \in R## is such that ##sup<a_n,s> \lt M##. Also, suppose ##\epsilon \gt 0## and ##m\in N## are such that ##<a_n,a> \lt \epsilon## ##\forall n\gt m##. What can you say then?
 
I posted this question on math-stackexchange but apparently I asked something stupid and I was downvoted. I still don't have an answer to my question so I hope someone in here can help me or at least explain me why I am asking something stupid. I started studying Complex Analysis and came upon the following theorem which is a direct consequence of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem: Let ##f:D\to\mathbb{C}## be an anlytic function over a simply connected region ##D##. If ##a## and ##z## are part of...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
3K