Limits of functions; approaching from left and right

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Limits
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the limits of a piecewise function defined as f(x) = {-x - 1 for -2 ≤ x < 0; -x + 1 for 0 ≤ x < 2}. The key point is that f(0-) = -1 and f(0+) = 1, highlighting that the limit from the left does not equal the function value at x = 0. The limit definition emphasizes that the limit as x approaches a value does not depend on the function's value at that point, which is crucial for understanding discontinuities in functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of piecewise functions
  • Knowledge of limit definitions in calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of continuity in functions
  • Basic algebra skills for evaluating functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of continuity and discontinuities in functions
  • Learn about the epsilon-delta definition of limits in calculus
  • Explore examples of piecewise functions and their limits
  • Investigate the implications of limits on function behavior at points of discontinuity
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, educators teaching limits and continuity, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of piecewise functions and their limits.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi all.

Please take a look at this function:

[tex] f(x) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> { - x - 1\,\,\,\,\,{\rm{for}}\,\,\,\,\, - 2 \le x < 0} \\<br /> { - x + 1\,\,\,\,\,{\rm{for}}\,\,\,\,\,0 \le x < 2} \\<br /> \end{array}} \right.[/tex]

According to my book we have that:

[tex] \begin{array}{l}<br /> f(0 - ) = - 1 \\ <br /> f(0 + ) = 1 \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

My question is: Why does f(0-) = -1, when f(x) = -x+1 for x = 0?
EDIT: I did write a title, but when I editted my post, it must apparently have been resetted. The title was: "Limits of functions; approaching from left and right". Perhaps a moderator can insert the title? Done - cristo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:

Homework Statement


Hi all.

Please take a look at this function:

[tex] f(x) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> { - x - 1\,\,\,\,\,{\rm{for}}\,\,\,\,\, - 2 \le x < 0} \\<br /> { - x + 1\,\,\,\,\,{\rm{for}}\,\,\,\,\,0 \le x < 2} \\<br /> \end{array}} \right.[/tex]

According to my book we have that:

[tex] \begin{array}{l}<br /> f(0 - ) = - 1 \\ <br /> f(0 + ) = 1 \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

My question is: Why does f(0-) = -1, when f(x) = -x+1 for x = 0?



EDIT: I did write a title, but when I editted my post, it must apparently have been resetted. The title was: "Limits of functions; approaching from left and right". Perhaps a moderator can insert the title? Done - cristo

Remember that [itex]f(0^-)= \lim_{x\rightarrow 0^-} f(x)[/itex] means the "limit from below". That is, we are looking at what f(x) is for x close to 0 but less than 0. For example, if x= -0.0000001, then x- 1= -0.0000001- 1= -1.0000001. That in itself does not tell us that the limit is -1 but it should be clear that no matter how close to 0 x is as long as it is not equal to 0!

The definition of "[itex]\lim(x\rightarrow a}f(x)= L[/itex]" is "Given any [itex]\epsilon> 0[/itex] there exist [itex]\delta> 0[/itex] such that if [itex]0< |x- a|< \delta[/itex], then [itex]|f(x)-L|< \epsilon[/itex].

Do you see that "0< |x- a|" part? (Which, I confess, I like many teachers often forget to write!) One of the crucially important things you need to learn about limits is this:
The [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)[/itex] has absolutely no dependence on f(a)!

If I define f(x)= 3x- 2 for x not[/b\] 0, then no matter what the value of f(a) is, or even if f(a) is undefined, [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} f(x)= -2[/itex].

One reason that is hard to understand is that we often learn to find limit by evaluating f(a)! But that only works for continuous functions. In fact, that is the definition of "continuous"! Because continuous functions are so nice, it happens that our methods of writing functions have grown up to make it easy to write continuous functions so we tend to automatically think that functions are continuous- that is NOT true. In a very specific sense, "almost all" functions are not continuous anywhere.
 
It there was a "Thread solved"-button, I would have pressed it.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K