1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Limits with the precise definition of a limit

  1. Nov 4, 2014 #1
    • Member warned about not including a solution effort
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Suppose that limit x-> a f(x)= infinity and limit x-> a g(x) = c, where c is a real number. Prove each statement.
    (a) lim x-> a [f(x) + g(x)] = infinity
    (b) lim x-> a [f(x)g(x)] = infinity if c > 0
    (c) lim x-> a [f(x)g(x)] = negative infinity if c < 0
    2. Relevant equations
    The limit laws would seem relevant, but the f(x) limit goes to infinity.

    3. The attempt at a solution
    I'm completely lost on how to start this problem. How would I prove something like the limit laws using the precise definition of a limit when one of the limits don't exist?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 4, 2014 #2

    vela

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor

    When you say that
    $$\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = \infty,$$ it's not exactly the same as saying the limit doesn't exist. For example, the limit
    $$\lim_{x \to 0} \sin \frac{1}{x}$$ doesn't exist, but you wouldn't say it's equal to infinity either. So what precisely does it mean when you write a limit equals infinity?
     
  4. Nov 4, 2014 #3

    Mark44

    Staff: Mentor

    Your textbook should have the precise definition of a limit when the function is unbounded. It doesn't use ##\delta## and ##\epsilon## as the normal limit does, but instead uses M and ##\delta##, where M is a large number.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Limits with the precise definition of a limit
Loading...